1993
DOI: 10.2307/2946533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complete Surfaces of Constant Mean Curvature-1 in the Hyperbolic 3-space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
192
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
192
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular we have the following corollary. 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 The fact that θ = π 2 suggests that this correspondence looks like the conjugate cousin correspondence between minimal surfaces in R 3 and CMC 1 surfaces in H 3 ( [Bry87], [UY93]). This correspondence has nice geometric properties, and is useful to construct CMC 1 surfaces in H 3 with some prescribed geometric properties starting from a solution of a Plateau problem in R 3 (see for example [Kar05], [Dan06]).…”
Section: A Generalized Lawson Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular we have the following corollary. 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000 The fact that θ = π 2 suggests that this correspondence looks like the conjugate cousin correspondence between minimal surfaces in R 3 and CMC 1 surfaces in H 3 ( [Bry87], [UY93]). This correspondence has nice geometric properties, and is useful to construct CMC 1 surfaces in H 3 with some prescribed geometric properties starting from a solution of a Plateau problem in R 3 (see for example [Kar05], [Dan06]).…”
Section: A Generalized Lawson Correspondencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…that is, the conformal representation becomes the Bryant's representation (see [2], [25]). Moreover, if the immersion does not lie in a horosphere and we denote by G its hyperbolic Gauss map, then taking A = G and B = 1 in (15) one gets from (21) and (22) …”
Section: Proof Let Us Assume That ψ(S)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the study of complete BLW-surfaces in R 4 can be reduced to the study of complete immersions with constant mean curvature one. Many things are known in this case and some very interesting results were proved in [2], [3] and [25].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Umehara and Yamada, Rosenberg, and others have been studying embeddedness of CMC 1 surfaces in H 3 [CHR1], [ET1], [LR], [UY1].) The goals of this article are three-fold:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%