Completeness of Retention Data and Determinants of Attrition in Birth Cohorts of Very Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: Birth cohorts provided essential knowledge for clinical and public health decision-making. However, little is known about retention and determinants of attrition in these specific longitudinal studies, although characterizing predictors of attrition sets the path to mitigate its occurrence and to promote valid inferences. We systematically reviewed retention in follow-ups of birth cohorts of very preterm or very low birth weight infants and the determinants of attrition. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017082672.Methods: Publications were identified through PubMed®, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2017. Studies were included when reporting at least one of the following: retention at follow-ups, reasons for attrition, or characteristics of non-participants. Quality assessment was conducted using the completeness of the report of participation features in the articles. Non-participant's characteristics were presented using descriptive statistics. Local polynomial regression was used to describe overall retention trends over years of follow-up.Results: We identified 57 eligible publications, reporting on 39 birth cohorts and describing 83 follow-up evaluations. The overall median retention was 87% (p25–p75:75.8–93.6), ranging from 14.6 to 100%. Overall, retention showed a downward trend with increasing child age. Completeness of retention report was considered “enough” in only 36.8% of publications. Considering the 33 (57.9%) publications providing information on participants and non-participants, and although no formal meta-analysis was performed, it was evident that participants lost to follow-up were more often male, had foreign-born, multiparous, and younger mothers, and with a lower socioeconomic status.Conclusion: This systematic review evidenced a lack of detailed data on retention, which may threaten the potential use of evidence derived from cohort studies of very preterm infants for clinical and public health purpose. It supports the requirement for a standardized presentation of retention features responding to current guidelines.

Neonatal amygdala resting-state functional connectivity and socio-emotional development in very preterm children

“…This suggests that those participants who were not followed-up in childhood were likely to be at higher social risk than those who were assessed. 141 …”

Record linkage of population-based cohort data from minors with national register data: a scoping review and comparative legal analysis of four European countries

“…It should be noted that while the GDPR allows member state law to impose or maintain special conditions and limitations in what concerns the processing of health data 60 , as well as prior consultation and authorization from the supervisory authority in relation to processing for the performance of tasks in the public interest, "including social protection and public health" 61 , none of the relevant national provisions existing prior to the GDPR were subject to revision since the Regulation was put into effect.…”

“…57 Article 9, Law 53/2017, of 14 July which creates and regulates the National Cancer Registry (National Oncologic Registry Act). 58 Article 16, Law 53/2017, of 14 July which creates and regulates the National Cancer Registry (National Oncologic Registry Act) 59 Article 13, Law 53/2017, of 14 July which Creates and regulates the National Cancer Registry (National Oncologic Registry Act) 60 Article 9(4) GDPR 61 Article 36(9) GDPR 62 67 Article 35 GDPR and Regulation 1/2018 CNPD. The latter provides a public list of the kind of processing operations requiring a DPIA.…”

“…Despite acknowledging that the opt-in consent is a crucial part of patient-centred approach in research for those patients who generally do not opt to participate in research 7 , we argue that the opt-out approach -as practiced in the Netherlands -is a suitable mean of obtaining consent in medical health research and may facilitate record linkage when based on the data protection and privacy rights of the data subjects as well as may encourage research participation 57,58 . This should be a factor to consider when aiming to circumvent the growing phenomena of refusals to participate in epidemiological studies [59][60][61][62][63] . Nevertheless, upcoming opt-out systems should have a focus on monitoring register performances and the purpose and criteria for evaluation must be determined before the execution 64 .…”

Incentive delivery timing and follow-up survey completion in a prospective cohort study of injured children: a randomized experiment comparing prepaid and postpaid incentives

“…In other instances, prepaid incentives skewed the representativeness of participants [ 24 , 25 ]. Demographic characteristics such as lower socioeconomic status have been associated with higher attrition in prior cohort studies [ 26 ]. These studies support the need to evaluate the impact of incentive timing on the demographics of retained participants in prospective health research.…”