1986
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(86)90125-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Completing a matrix when certain entries of its inverse are specified

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This allows us to move the structure blocks to an arbitrary matrix position, not necessarily situated in the bottom left matrix corner anymore. Moreover, in the case of shift matrix Λ → 0 or Λ → ∞I, we obtain in this way an alternative derivation of a theorem due to Fiedler [5] (see Corollary 20 further on).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This allows us to move the structure blocks to an arbitrary matrix position, not necessarily situated in the bottom left matrix corner anymore. Moreover, in the case of shift matrix Λ → 0 or Λ → ∞I, we obtain in this way an alternative derivation of a theorem due to Fiedler [5] (see Corollary 20 further on).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…(Here we assumed that B −1 exists). Moreover, this block representation is useful in the sense that the left hand side of (3) can be realized as a Schur complement in (5). This is the basis of the following inversion result.…”
Section: Displacement Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barrett also pointed out that (1) follows immediately from the beautiful observation by Fiedler and Markham [10] that (in this notation)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The Nullity Theorem was given in 1984 by Gustafson [13] in the language of modules over a ring and in 1986 by Fiedler and Markham [10] in matrix language. A neat and simple proof will be in Section 0.7.5 of the forthcoming new edition of [16].…”
Section: References and Alternative Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%