2010
DOI: 10.13001/1081-3810.1419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Completing block Hermitian matrices with maximal and minimal ranks and inertias

Abstract: Abstract. For a Hermitian matrix with its main block diagonal given, this paper shows how to choose the off-diagonal blocks such that the resulting matrix has the maximal and minimal possible ranks and inertias, respectively. Some direct consequences and applications are also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where K is an example of a block diagonal partial Hermitian matrix (Tian 2010). Clearly, the number of individual elements to be estimated in K is far less than in G. For example, for n p 8,750 and k p 50, as in our empirical analysis below, K contains 223,125 unique elements, compared to 3.83#10 7 unique elements in G. Therefore, only 0.6% of the unique elements of G are contained in K. Such an enormous difference in the number of elements to be estimated provides a strong incentive to find ways to complete G when only K is estimated from the data (Candes and Recht 2009;Tian 2010).…”
Section: The Problem Of Matrix Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where K is an example of a block diagonal partial Hermitian matrix (Tian 2010). Clearly, the number of individual elements to be estimated in K is far less than in G. For example, for n p 8,750 and k p 50, as in our empirical analysis below, K contains 223,125 unique elements, compared to 3.83#10 7 unique elements in G. Therefore, only 0.6% of the unique elements of G are contained in K. Such an enormous difference in the number of elements to be estimated provides a strong incentive to find ways to complete G when only K is estimated from the data (Candes and Recht 2009;Tian 2010).…”
Section: The Problem Of Matrix Completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As direct applications, we gave necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of X satisfying the triple matrix equations in (1.2) and (1.3), as well as some matrix inequalities. Although the problems of maximizing and minimizing ranks and inertias of matrices are generally regarded as NP-hard, the results presented in this previous sections as well as the papers [13,15,16,17,18,30,31,32,36,38] show that many closed-form formulas for calculating global extremal ranks inertias of some simpler matrix expressions can be established symbolically by using some pure algebraic operations of matrices, while these explicit formulas can be used to solve many fundamental problems in matrix theory, as mentioned in the beginning of this paper. All the results obtained in these papers are brand-new, but easy to understand within the scope of elementary linear algebra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This basic work was also extended to some general LMFs, such as, A − BX − (BX) * , A − BXB * − CY C * and A − BXC − (BXC) * , where X and Y are (Hermitian) variable matrices of appropriate sizes; see [2,15,16,17,18,32,33,36]. We shall use some pure algebraic operations on matrices to derive two groups of analytical formulas for calculating the global extremal values of the objective functions in (1.4)-(1.7) and (1.9)- (1.12), and then to present a variety of valuable consequences of these formulas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) the minimum of {rk(Ã)|Ã completion of A} is Here we determine the maximum rank of the symmetric completions of a symmetric partial matrix where only the diagonal blocks are given (see Theorem 5) and the minimum rank and the maximum rank of the antisymmetric completions of an antisymmetric partial matrix where only the diagonal blocks are given (see Theorem 9). In [3], [4], [9], the analogous problem has been solved for hermitian matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%