1995
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-59200-8_48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Completion for multiple reduction orderings

Abstract: We present a completion procedure (called MKB) which works with multiple reduction orderings. Given equations and a set of reduction orderings, the procedure simulates a computation performed by the parallel processes each of which executes the standard Knuth-Bendix completion procedure $(\mathrm{K}\mathrm{B})$ with one of the given orderings. To gain efficiency, however, we develop new inference rules working on objects called nodes, which are data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Completion with multiple reduction orders-referred to as multi-completion in the sequel-was proposed by Kondo and Kurihara [15]. For a set O = { 1 , .…”
Section: Multi-completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Completion with multiple reduction orders-referred to as multi-completion in the sequel-was proposed by Kondo and Kurihara [15]. For a set O = { 1 , .…”
Section: Multi-completionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic control of mkbTT is a multi-completion variant of a discount loop, very similar to the one originally proposed for completion with multiple reduction orders [15]. Pseudo-code describing the control loop is given in Fig.…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper we describe a new tool for performing KnuthBendix completion with automatic termination tools. It is based on two ingredients: (1) the inference system for completion with multiple reduction orderings introduced by Kurihara and Kondo (1999) and (2) the inference system for completion with external termination provers proposed by Wehrman, Stump and Westbrook (2006) and implemented in the Slothrop system. Our tool can be used with any termination tool that satisfies certain minimal requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%