2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-022-02622-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex carotid artery segmentation in multi-contrast MR sequences by improved optimal surface graph cuts based on flow line learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors limited the scans by a 128 × 128 × 16 bounding box placed in the center of the ground-truth segmentations. Zhu et al [39] and Alblas et al [28] applied 3D U-Net for CA localization and 2D CNN for CA segmentation method similar to ours that employs the sequential application of two deep learning models for 1) 3D CA centerline detection and 2) 2D CA wall contouring. They achieved a median DSC of 81.3% for the vessel wall on the opensource dataset acquired with the same MR protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors limited the scans by a 128 × 128 × 16 bounding box placed in the center of the ground-truth segmentations. Zhu et al [39] and Alblas et al [28] applied 3D U-Net for CA localization and 2D CNN for CA segmentation method similar to ours that employs the sequential application of two deep learning models for 1) 3D CA centerline detection and 2) 2D CA wall contouring. They achieved a median DSC of 81.3% for the vessel wall on the opensource dataset acquired with the same MR protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They achieved a median DSC of 81.3% for the vessel wall on the opensource dataset acquired with the same MR protocol. Zhu et al [39] achieved DSCs of 89.68% and 80.29% for the lumen and wall segmentation, respectively. They combined deep learning and graph-based approaches and applied them to the multi-sequence MRI acquired with the same protocols.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, ischaemic stroke due to carotid atherosclerotic plaque is the most common cause of death after heart disease and cancer, with some studies suggesting that 80% of cerebral ischaemic processes are caused by carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque 6,7 .Therefore, early detection and identi cation of vulnerable plaque in the carotid arteries is very important.Currently, ultrasound (US), computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and other imaging methods are used to evaluate carotid atherosclerotic lesions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and others [8][9][10][11][12] .Among them, ultrasound imaging, with its wide range of applications and high detection rate of vulnerable plaques, is more effective in identifying atherosclerotic plaques in practice than other imaging modalities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, various medical image segmentation algorithm have been presented, which can be broadly grouped into thresholding ( Jain and Singh, 2022 ; Rawas and El-Zaart, 2022 ), watershed ( Mohanapriya and Kalaavathi, 2019 ; Sadegh et al, 2022 ), clustering ( Xu et al, 2022 ; Zhou et al, 2022 ), conditional random field ( Sun et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2022 ), dictionary learning ( Yang Y Y et al, 2020 ; Tang et al, 2021 ), graph cut ( Gamechi et al, 2021 ; Zhu et al, 2021 ), region growing ( Rundo et al, 2016 ; Biratu et al, 2021 ), active contour ( Dake et al, 2019 ; Shahvaran et al, 2021 ), quantum-inspired computing ( Sergioli et al, 2021 ; Amin et al, 2022 ), computational intelligence ( Vijay et al, 2016 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ). These traditional methods rely on developers to design algorithms for specific applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%