2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex dynamics of a predator–prey–parasite system: An interplay among infection rate, predator's reproductive gain and preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will denoteλ + =λ 2 andλ − =λ 3 . Since a [3] 13 < 0 and a [3] 31 > 0, the real parts ofλ 2 andλ 3 will be of the same sign as that of a [3] 11 . Now, if K < K cr = c1(δ+ω4) (ω4−δ) , then a [3] 11 > 0 and two eigenvalues of J (E 3 ) will be positive; hence the proof follows from Sotomayor [58].…”
Section: (C+ŝ)(a(c1+ŝ)+p ω2) S(c1+ŝ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We will denoteλ + =λ 2 andλ − =λ 3 . Since a [3] 13 < 0 and a [3] 31 > 0, the real parts ofλ 2 andλ 3 will be of the same sign as that of a [3] 11 . Now, if K < K cr = c1(δ+ω4) (ω4−δ) , then a [3] 11 > 0 and two eigenvalues of J (E 3 ) will be positive; hence the proof follows from Sotomayor [58].…”
Section: (C+ŝ)(a(c1+ŝ)+p ω2) S(c1+ŝ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the eigenvalues of J (E 3 ) will be zero if and only if det J (E 3 ) = −a [3] 13 a [3] 22 a [3] 31 = 0, i.e. a [3] 22 = 0, since (a [3] 13 , a [3] 31 ) ̸ = (0, 0). This gives β = β * =…”
Section: Bifurcation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations