2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex experimental research on internal tooth dosimetry for the Techa River region: A model for 90Sr accumulation in human teeth formed by time of intakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2009, the measured 90 Sr/ 90 Y activity in tooth enamel was 2.1 ± 1.1 Bq/g. The estimated cumulated internal dose was 800 ± 400 mGy, 50 years after uptake of 90 Sr in 1957, calculated with a dose rate coefficient of 0.056 nGy/g/s, assuming only radioactive decay without biological removal of 90 Sr from enamel (Tikunov et al 2006 ), which is close to the measured total absorbed dose in enamel of 1,190 mGy. 90 Sr content below detection limit was found for one tooth (ID 2033) with absorbed dose in enamel of 226 mGy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…In 2009, the measured 90 Sr/ 90 Y activity in tooth enamel was 2.1 ± 1.1 Bq/g. The estimated cumulated internal dose was 800 ± 400 mGy, 50 years after uptake of 90 Sr in 1957, calculated with a dose rate coefficient of 0.056 nGy/g/s, assuming only radioactive decay without biological removal of 90 Sr from enamel (Tikunov et al 2006 ), which is close to the measured total absorbed dose in enamel of 1,190 mGy. 90 Sr content below detection limit was found for one tooth (ID 2033) with absorbed dose in enamel of 226 mGy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Further incorporation is mainly due to ion transport between the enamel surface and surrounding fluids. However, Tikunov et al (2006), using low background β−counting, detected non-negligible 90 Sr concentrations in teeth already formed completely by the time of contamination, which suggests that post-eruption uptake of radioisotopes by enamel should not be ignored. Loss of minerals from tooth enamel is attributed mainly to ion diffusion and tooth surface reactions.…”
Section: Epr Response Of Tooth Enamel To Doses From Internal β β β β-mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the radioactivity level is sufficiently high, the volume-averaged 90 Sr concentration can be obtained by the traditional in vivo tooth β−counters and in vitro radiochemical methods (Tolstykh et al, 2000); otherwise, it can be measured by a low-background β−counting set, such as used by Tikunov et al (2006). Distribution of the β-emitting radionuclide concentration can be mapped with two methods: thin TLD (Goksu et al, 2002) and photostimulable phosphor imaging plates (Romanyukha et al, 2002b;Shishkina et al, 2002 Sr incorporated in dentine Tolstykh et al 2000), in jaw bone, and tooth enamel itself (Tolstykh et al 2000).…”
Section: A) Measurement Of the Radionuclide Distribution In Tooth Enamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods that have been frequently used to measure independently the radioactivity in the tooth are the thermoluminescence-based beta dosimetry (Shishkina et al 2005 ; Veronese et al 2008 ; Shishkina 2012 ), the scintillating detectors (Tikunov et al 2006 ), the measurement of 90 Sr with a whole-body counter or the gas-flow Geiger-Muller detectors (Tolstykh et al 2000 , 2003 ). The absorbed dose to tooth enamel from the internal contamination of radionuclides in the enamel itself or in the nearby tissues, is then estimated by using computational phantoms and dosimetric models (Volchkova et al 2009 ; Ferrari 2010 ; Shishkina et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Retrospective Dosimetry Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%