2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0096-3003(02)00280-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex filiform Lie algebras of dimension 11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1991, J.R. G ómez classified those of dimension 9 in his Ph. D. Thesis, later published by F.J. Echarte and himself in [84], and L. Boza, F.J. Echarte and J. N ú ñez [39] those of dimension 10 in 1994. Later, J.R. G ómez, A. Jiménez and Y.B.…”
Section: Nilpotent Lie Algebras: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1991, J.R. G ómez classified those of dimension 9 in his Ph. D. Thesis, later published by F.J. Echarte and himself in [84], and L. Boza, F.J. Echarte and J. N ú ñez [39] those of dimension 10 in 1994. Later, J.R. G ómez, A. Jiménez and Y.B.…”
Section: Nilpotent Lie Algebras: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the explicit lists, L. Boza, E.M. Fedriani and J. N ú ñez [40] got in 1998 the classification of complex filiform Lie algebras of dimension 12, and also showed in 2003 ( [42]) an explicit classification of such algebras of dimension 11, in a different way as the one used in [110]. Although [41] supplied a method valid for every dimension over the complex field, the involved computations are too hard to be nowadays tacked successfully.…”
Section: Nilpotent Lie Algebras: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gómez et al [17] classified the symplectic filiform Lie algebras that are not two-to-two symplectic-isomorphic of dimensions less than or equal to 10 in 2001. Higher dimensions were tackled by Boza et al [18] and Echarte et al [19,20] in the last ten years. The more the dimension increases, the more and more complex is the determination of exhaustive lists of Lie algebras, so new computation methodologies are a present field of research [21][22][23].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were introduced formally by Vergne [21,22] in the late 1960s, although Umlauf had already used them as an example in his thesis [19]. The distribution into isomorphism classes of n-dimensional filiform Lie algebras over the complex field is known for n ≤ 12 [6,11], even if it is only known for nilpotent Lie algebras over the complex field of dimension n ≤ 7 [4]. More recently, some authors have dealt with the classification of n-dimensional nilpotent Lie algebras over finite fields F p = Z/pZ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%