2015
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2015.19.237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex hyperbolic geometry of the figure-eight knot

Abstract: Abstract. We show that the figure eight knot complement admits a uniformizable spherical CR structure, i.e. it occurs as the manifold at infinity of a complex hyperbolic orbifold. The uniformization is unique provided we require the peripheral subgroups to have unipotent holonomy.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 (3,3,4)-group uniformising the figure eight knot complement. Obtained by Deraux and Falbel in [8]. 5 (3,3, n)-groups, proved to be discrete by in [26].…”
Section: Main Definitions and Discreteness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…4 (3,3,4)-group uniformising the figure eight knot complement. Obtained by Deraux and Falbel in [8]. 5 (3,3, n)-groups, proved to be discrete by in [26].…”
Section: Main Definitions and Discreteness Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Remark 1. From (8), it is easy to see that projections of boundaries of Cygan spheres onto the z-factor are closed Euclidean discs in C. This correspond to the vertical projection onto C in the Heisenberg group. This fact is often useful to prove that two Cygan spheres are disjoint.…”
Section: Cygan Spheres and Geographical Coordinatesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…] . For this manifold, one get a complete list of representation whose peripheral holonomy is unipotent (see [Fal08] and more recently [DE13], which shows that ρ 2 and ρ 3 are intimately related). Up to some Galois conjugations there are only 4 of them:…”
Section: Example : the 8-knot Complementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case n = 4 combines work of Deraux, Falbel and Wang [3,6]. The cleanest statement may be found in Theorem 4.2 of Deraux [2], which also treats the case n = 5.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%