2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex integrated analysis of lncRNAs-miRNAs-mRNAs in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
69
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
10
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RNA pull down confirmed the binding ability between PART1 and miR‐635. Except for miR‐129 in ESCC, miR‐133a, miR‐135b, miR‐196b, and miR‐193b in oral squamous cell carcinoma, to the best of our knowledge, we first found that miR‐635 was a new target miRNA for PART1. Moreover, in the present study, we demonstrated that PART1 promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC, while knockdown of PART1 performed the opposite effects on NSCLC progression.Other lncRNAs, such as MALAT1, HOTAIR, and UCA1, that were highly expressed in NSCLC, also promoted the progression and the inhibition of these lncRNAs suppressed the progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…RNA pull down confirmed the binding ability between PART1 and miR‐635. Except for miR‐129 in ESCC, miR‐133a, miR‐135b, miR‐196b, and miR‐193b in oral squamous cell carcinoma, to the best of our knowledge, we first found that miR‐635 was a new target miRNA for PART1. Moreover, in the present study, we demonstrated that PART1 promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of NSCLC, while knockdown of PART1 performed the opposite effects on NSCLC progression.Other lncRNAs, such as MALAT1, HOTAIR, and UCA1, that were highly expressed in NSCLC, also promoted the progression and the inhibition of these lncRNAs suppressed the progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several studies acquired data from public transcriptome data sets. When analysing merged data from three data sets, the TCGA and 2 GEO datasets (GSE9844 (Ye et al., ) and GSE13601 (Estilo et al., )), multivariate Cox regression analysis identified three lncRNAs as independent prognostic markers for OS in OSCC patients ( p < 0.05), namely overexpressed C10orf91 (chromosome 10 open reading frame 91) andC2orf48 (chromosome 2 open reading frame 48) and underexpressed TTTY14 (testis‐specific transcript, Y‐linked 14) (Li et al., ). An univariate analysis of 42 OSCCs from the GSE3524 data set (Toruner et al., ) revealed that the overexpression of H19 was significantly related to poorer OS (Hong et al., ).…”
Section: De Lncrnas and Clinicopathological Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growing evidence indicates that lncRNAs and mRNAs can cross-regulate each other by competing for shared miRNA response elements (MREs) [16,20]. Specifically, many lncRNAs act as sponges in the regulation of miRNA target genes involved in OSCC carcinogenesis [21,22]. miR-433, a well-characterized miRNA, was found to be a tumor suppressor in different neoplasms [23,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%