2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.108098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex network modeling of EEG band coupling in dyslexia: An exploratory analysis of auditory processing and diagnosis

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVMs have been frequently used as classifiers in the EEG literature (see Ref. [38] for a recent example) and have shown performances ranging from 0.6-0.95 AUC in EEG classification problems using longer inputs. Each classifier was trained with a different number of CSP filters to detect the optimal number of features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…SVMs have been frequently used as classifiers in the EEG literature (see Ref. [38] for a recent example) and have shown performances ranging from 0.6-0.95 AUC in EEG classification problems using longer inputs. Each classifier was trained with a different number of CSP filters to detect the optimal number of features.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large non-linear EEG-based classifiers have previously been engineered for dyslexia using long time windows of AM noise, with degrees of success reaching an AUC ~ 0.8 [37, 38]. By contrast, we test classification performances for both dyslexic and typically-developing children using a linear classifier and short epochs of naturalistic speech listening data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability to use high temporal (EEG) and spatial (fMRI) resolution during experimental paradigms make these techniques excellent tools for the identification of physiological correlates of reading processes (Carter et al, 2019;Duffy et al, 1980). It has been demonstrated that these tools can be useful in the evaluation of reading impairments (Gallego-Molina et al, 2022;Ortiz et al, 2020). Importantly, these studies have demonstrated that assessment of reading processes using neuro-imaging tools can lower the age of diagnosis for children with dyslexia (Chyl et al, 2021;Ortiz et al, 2020) and identify abnormal neural activation patterns prior to formal literacy instruction (Schiavone et al, 2014;Wilkinson et al, 2020).…”
Section: Neuroscience Of Reading Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASSR (Auditory steady-state response) EEGs measure the response that is evoked by a periodically repeated auditory stimulus (Farahani et al 2021;Hwang et al 2020). This kind of neurophysiological response has been used successfully to study patients with schizofrenia (Koshiyama et al 2021), bipolar disorder, depression and autism (Jefsen et al 2022) and, more recently, developmental dyslexia (Gallego-Molina et al 2022). Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) are not available in those cases so that clustering of ICs must be tackled using other features such as spectra-time frequency results or source-localization (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%