2007
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/79/38004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex networks in brain electrical activity

Abstract: This paper is the result of work carried out at Starlab in collaboration with the Neurodynamics Laboratory of the U. of Barcelona (UBNL) focusing on complex networks analysis of EEG data (provided by UBNL). The approach is inspired by the work in [6] with fMRI data and represents a follow up on earlier efforts on analysis of ERP/MMN data using tomography and independent component analysis to characterize brain connectivity and spatial funcionalization [22]. Multichannel EEG measurements are first processed to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the latter case techniques such as bandpass filtering and cortical mapping (a simpler version of EEG tomography where the generating dipoles are constrained on the cortical surface) could be used to generate target maps (see the discussion below). Indeed, EEG connectivity analysis can be carried out at the voxel or node level as opposed to electrode space (see, e.g., Ray et al (2007)). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case techniques such as bandpass filtering and cortical mapping (a simpler version of EEG tomography where the generating dipoles are constrained on the cortical surface) could be used to generate target maps (see the discussion below). Indeed, EEG connectivity analysis can be carried out at the voxel or node level as opposed to electrode space (see, e.g., Ray et al (2007)). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we can derive connectivity networks in electrode or in cortical space and estimate their algorithmic complexity (see, e.g. Ray et al 2007 ; Soler-Toscano et al 2014 ; Zenil et al 2014 ; Zenil et al 2015a ). Power laws and scale-free behavior with spectra are also probably closely associated with simple TM chatter ( Eguiluz et al 2005 ), as proposed above.…”
Section: Experimental Methods In Ktmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, we associate a mutual information graph with each subject frame stack. We can then analyze these graphs using standard metrics such as average degree or clustering index C [29], [30]. Such analysis can also help analyze how compression of the data is actually taking place, as we discuss below.…”
Section: F Mutual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%