2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-015-0860-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Non-rigid 3D Shape Recovery Using a Procrustean Normal Distribution Mixture Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most closely related to the present paper are generic factorization approaches for recovering 3D non-rigid shapes from image sequences captured with a single camera [7,3,14,57,12], i.e., non-rigid structure from motion (NRSFM), and human pose recovery models based on known skeletons [20,43,47,30,21] or sparse representations [32,15,2,55,56]. Much of this work has been realized by assuming manually labeled 2D joint locations; however, there is some recent work that has used a 2D pose detector to automatically provide the input joints [40,48] or solved 2D and 3D pose estimation jointly [39,54].…”
Section: ……mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most closely related to the present paper are generic factorization approaches for recovering 3D non-rigid shapes from image sequences captured with a single camera [7,3,14,57,12], i.e., non-rigid structure from motion (NRSFM), and human pose recovery models based on known skeletons [20,43,47,30,21] or sparse representations [32,15,2,55,56]. Much of this work has been realized by assuming manually labeled 2D joint locations; however, there is some recent work that has used a 2D pose detector to automatically provide the input joints [40,48] or solved 2D and 3D pose estimation jointly [39,54].…”
Section: ……mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most closely related to our work are generic factorization approaches for recovering 3D non-rigid shapes from image sequences captured with a single camera [4], [47], [48], [49], [50], i.e., non-rigid structure from motion (NRSFM), and human pose recovery models based on known skeletons [2], [3], [51], [52], [53], [54] or sparse representations [5], [55], [56], [57], [58]. Much of this work has been realized by assuming manually labeled 2D joint locations; however, there is some recent work that has used a 2D pose detector to automatically provide the input joints [59], [60] or solved 2D and 3D pose estimation jointly [61], [12].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This should in practice factor out the rigid transformations from the statistical distribution of deformations. The PND model has been then extended to deal with more complex deformations and longer sequences (Cho et al 2016).…”
Section: Statisticalmentioning
confidence: 99%