1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.1997.540287.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex polynomials for the computation of 2D gravity anomalies

Abstract: We present an efficient algorithm using a complex variables formulation for the computation of the gravity effect of 2D polygonal bodies having densities varying both laterally and with depth. The first derivatives of the gravity effect are also provided in order to enable the computation of the Jacobian matrix, which is necessary for linear inverse gravity problems. A geophysical example based on numerical assumptions about the density contrast on a well‐studied basin area shows the applicability of the algor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The methods can generally be divided into two main groups, namely the space ________ domain methods, and the frequency domain methods. Numerous methods have been developed to calculate gravity anomaly of 2D structures in the space domain [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Some authors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods can generally be divided into two main groups, namely the space ________ domain methods, and the frequency domain methods. Numerous methods have been developed to calculate gravity anomaly of 2D structures in the space domain [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Some authors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1999b). These inversion methods are then extended to include heterogeneous cases where the density contrast varies with depth linearly (Reamer and Ferguson 1989), quadratically (Bhaskara Rao 1986), exponentially (Chai and Hinze 1988; Bhaskara Rao and Mohan Rao 1999), as a polynomial function of horizontal and vertical positions (Oliva and Ravazzoli 1997; Zhou 2010), hyperbolically (Rao et al . 1994; Silva, Costa and Barbosa 2006; Silva et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a stable and convergent inversion solution, a smoothness constraint is usually superimposed for homogeneous sedimentary basins (Bott 1960;Parker 1973;Oldenburg 1974;Pilkington and Crossley 1986;Leão et al 1996;Medeiros 1997, 1999a;Barbosa et al 1999b). These inversion methods are then extended to include heterogeneous cases where the density contrast varies with depth linearly (Reamer and Ferguson 1989), quadratically (Bhaskara Rao 1986), exponentially (Chai and Hinze 1988;Bhaskara Rao and Mohan Rao 1999), as a polynomial function of horizontal and vertical positions (Oliva and Ravazzoli 1997;Zhou 2010), hyperbolically (Rao et al 1994;Silva, Costa and Barbosa 2006;Silva et al 2010), or parabolically (Chakravarthi and Sundararajan 2004) with smoothness constraint imposed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%