2009
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0902129106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex population structure in African village dogs and its implications for inferring dog domestication history

Abstract: High genetic diversity of East Asian village dogs has recently been used to argue for an East Asian origin of the domestic dog. However, global village dog genetic diversity and the extent to which semiferal village dogs represent distinct, indigenous populations instead of admixtures of various dog breeds has not been quantified. Understanding these issues is critical to properly reconstructing the timing, number, and locations of dog domestication. To address these questions, we sampled 318 village dogs from… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
127
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
127
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sequence divergence between the Tibetan Mastiff and the gray wolf (0.70) was smaller than that between the Tibetan Mastiff and the Tibetan wolf (3.30), and between the Tibetan Mastiff and coyote (5.27). This suggested that the Tibetan Mastiff originated from the gray wolf, the same as with other domestic dogs (Vilà et al, 1997;Leonard et al, 2002;Verginelli et al, 2005;Boyko et al, 2009;Pang et al, 2009), and is consistent with the results of Li et al (2008). For the protein-coding genes, tRNAs and rRNAs, a decreasing trend in the number of identified variable sites, also showed that there was a closer relationship between domestic dogs and gray wolves than between domestic dogs and coyotes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The sequence divergence between the Tibetan Mastiff and the gray wolf (0.70) was smaller than that between the Tibetan Mastiff and the Tibetan wolf (3.30), and between the Tibetan Mastiff and coyote (5.27). This suggested that the Tibetan Mastiff originated from the gray wolf, the same as with other domestic dogs (Vilà et al, 1997;Leonard et al, 2002;Verginelli et al, 2005;Boyko et al, 2009;Pang et al, 2009), and is consistent with the results of Li et al (2008). For the protein-coding genes, tRNAs and rRNAs, a decreasing trend in the number of identified variable sites, also showed that there was a closer relationship between domestic dogs and gray wolves than between domestic dogs and coyotes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The genetic landscape that we observe is that of a complex conglomerate, in contrast to similar analyses in other species with a much more marked structure, such as dogs. Nevertheless, the analyses of village dogs have also proven to be much more complex than those of well-established breeds (Boyko et al, 2009). In particular, we did not observe that genetic distance or average F ST was a proxy for geographic distance, likely because livestock populations have a great mobility and corresponding complex genetic histories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Boyko et al (2009) sampled microsatellites and SNPs from village dogs from Egypt to Namibia and pure bred dogs of putative African origin. They found that African village dogs display high genetic diversity and are remarkably free from admixture with non-African breeds, except in two exceptional situations of deliberate breeding.…”
Section: Dogsmentioning
confidence: 99%