2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3319269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Pyramid Structure, Judicial Efficiency and Firm Performance A Comparative Analysis of Chinese and Pakistani Listed Companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several indicators used to measure the efficiency of the judicial system of a nation are captured under “enforcing contracts”. Some of the indicators are: the time in days spent in resolving a judicial case from the point of instituting the case until implementing the final decision by a court (Wang, Wang & Li, 2014; Shah, Shah, Smith & Labianca, 2017; Shah, Xiao & Quresh, 2019); the number of procedures followed to solve a case from the point of case initiation until the decision is implemented by the court (Shah, Shah, Smith & Labianca, 2017); enforcement of judgment days; attorney fees; court fees; enforcement fees; quality of judicial process, court structure and proceedings; cost as a percentage of claim, among others. Following Wang, Wang and Li (2014) and Shah, Shah, Smith and Labianca (2017), we measure judicial efficiency as cost as a percentage of claim.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several indicators used to measure the efficiency of the judicial system of a nation are captured under “enforcing contracts”. Some of the indicators are: the time in days spent in resolving a judicial case from the point of instituting the case until implementing the final decision by a court (Wang, Wang & Li, 2014; Shah, Shah, Smith & Labianca, 2017; Shah, Xiao & Quresh, 2019); the number of procedures followed to solve a case from the point of case initiation until the decision is implemented by the court (Shah, Shah, Smith & Labianca, 2017); enforcement of judgment days; attorney fees; court fees; enforcement fees; quality of judicial process, court structure and proceedings; cost as a percentage of claim, among others. Following Wang, Wang and Li (2014) and Shah, Shah, Smith and Labianca (2017), we measure judicial efficiency as cost as a percentage of claim.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate governance is treated as a basic element in developing countries. As corporate governance code of Pakistan are determined by the Security and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP) in March 2002 (Kazi, Arain, & Sahetiya, 2018) and stated that ownership structure and board characteristics are essential elements in firm performance in the corporate governance perspectives (Shah, Xiao, & Quresh, 2019). Firm ownership and management are considered primary indicators which can be helpful in controlling and monitoring effectively the plans, authority control, resource allocation and many other indicators which are useful for firm performance (Carney, 2005; Daily, Dalton, & Cannella Jr, 2003; Daspit, Chrisman, Sharma, Pearson, & Mahto, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%