2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2010.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex repetitive behavior: Punding after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, following DERM-SAP treatment, roughly 30% of mu opioid receptor-labeled patches remained intact, which could explain why there was not a complete abolishment of stereotypy following repeated COC treatment and challenge. It is also possible that extrastriatal regions such as the pedunculopontine nucleus or subthalamic nucleus may also contribute to psychostimulant-induced stereotypic behavior (Aliane et al, 2012; Barwick et al, 2000; Inglis et al, 1994; Mathur et al, 1997; Pallanti et al, 2010). Nevertheless, despite these potential limitations, these are among the data first to specifically examine the role of the patch compartment in the development of stereotypic behaviors following repeated COC treatment and challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, following DERM-SAP treatment, roughly 30% of mu opioid receptor-labeled patches remained intact, which could explain why there was not a complete abolishment of stereotypy following repeated COC treatment and challenge. It is also possible that extrastriatal regions such as the pedunculopontine nucleus or subthalamic nucleus may also contribute to psychostimulant-induced stereotypic behavior (Aliane et al, 2012; Barwick et al, 2000; Inglis et al, 1994; Mathur et al, 1997; Pallanti et al, 2010). Nevertheless, despite these potential limitations, these are among the data first to specifically examine the role of the patch compartment in the development of stereotypic behaviors following repeated COC treatment and challenge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to keep in mind that following DERM-SAP treatment, roughly 30% of mu opioid receptor-labeled patches remained intact, which could explain why we failed to see a complete abolishment of METH-induced stereotypy. Furthermore, the fact that a certain degree of METH-induced stereotypy remained following perturbation of the patch compartment points to a potential contribution of extrastriatal regions such as the pedunculopontine nucleus or subthalamic nucleus to psychostimulant-induced stereotypic behavior (Aliane et al ., 2012, Barwick et al ., 2000, Inglis et al ., 1994, Mathur et al ., 1997, Pallanti et al ., 2010). In addition, since our techniques involved one-dimensional analyses of patch density and utilized mean density of mu opioid receptor immunohistochemical staining rather than quantifying cell counts to determine the degree of patch destruction, it is possible that we were not able to fully detect the effects of DERM-SAP treatment on the patch compartment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies found a high prevalence of OCS and OCD also in Parkinson’s disease, but some others did not (Maia et al, 2003; Harbishettara et al, 2005). Furthermore, Pallanti et al (2010) described the onset of a complex repetitive behavior (defined as “pounding”) after bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s patients. Pounding has been interpreted as a compulsive behavior and is defined as a stereotypic motor behavior characterized by an intense fascination with repetitive purposeless movements, such as taking a part mechanical objects, handling common objects as if they were new and entertaining and continuously picking at oneself, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%