2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex resistivity signatures of ethanol biodegradation in porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, it decreases to increase again during biofilm growing period up to 10 mrad. These results are consistent with those of Personna et al () who studied ethanol biodeg‐radation in columns and observed a similar temporal variation of the ϕ response. They observed a slight increase (up to 1.5 mrad) after microbial inoculation and then a slight decrease and an abrupt jump reaching a peak value of 9 mrad at 0.2 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, it decreases to increase again during biofilm growing period up to 10 mrad. These results are consistent with those of Personna et al () who studied ethanol biodeg‐radation in columns and observed a similar temporal variation of the ϕ response. They observed a slight increase (up to 1.5 mrad) after microbial inoculation and then a slight decrease and an abrupt jump reaching a peak value of 9 mrad at 0.2 Hz.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They observed a slight increase (up to 1.5 mrad) after microbial inoculation and then a slight decrease and an abrupt jump reaching a peak value of 9 mrad at 0.2 Hz. According to Personna et al (), the ϕ response reflected changes occurring in the system as a result of biodegradation processes. However, Personna et al detected only 1.5 mrad phase shift, whereas this experiment recorded 15 mrad during inoculation period (noted 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have measured DC resistivity and IP anomalies at contaminant plumes caused by physical changes on the grain surface due to biofilm formation during microbial biodegradation and iron precipitates (Aal et al, ; Atekwana & Atekwana, ; Atekwana & Slater, ; Personna et al, ; Williams et al, ). In our study, we use the IP data to remove the effect of surface conductivity from the bulk conductivity, and this is possible under the assumption that the IP signal is controlled by the surface area of the sediments, and not by the presence of, e.g., biofilms and/or iron precipitates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), which introduces ambiguity in data interpretation (Personna et al . ; Ntarlagiannis et al . , ; Fernandez et al .…”
Section: Microbially Mediated Processes and Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…geology) and biodegradation of hydrocarbons through redox reactions lead to additional physical and chemical changes in the subsurface with measurable IP signatures ( Fig. 4), which introduces ambiguity in data interpretation (Personna et al 2013a;Ntarlagiannis et al 2016Ntarlagiannis et al , 2018Fernandez et al 2018;Kimak et al 2019).…”
Section: Hydrocarbon Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%