1972
DOI: 10.2307/1996246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex Structures on Riemann Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[51][52][53], in which the stiffness and overlap matrices of the weak (variational) formulation of the hyperbolic Schrödinger equation ( 14) are first computed using FreeFEM++ with unconstrained boundary conditions, and the number of physical degrees of freedom is subsequently reduced using simple matrix operations before proceeding to numerical diagonalization. The generalized Bloch phases (25) are easily introduced at this second stage, as we now explain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[51][52][53], in which the stiffness and overlap matrices of the weak (variational) formulation of the hyperbolic Schrödinger equation ( 14) are first computed using FreeFEM++ with unconstrained boundary conditions, and the number of physical degrees of freedom is subsequently reduced using simple matrix operations before proceeding to numerical diagonalization. The generalized Bloch phases (25) are easily introduced at this second stage, as we now explain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the eigenvalues of J can be seen as the origin of the imaginary units ±i on each tangent space. Seeing that the Fuchsian quotient H/Γ always possesses an integrable complex structure J requires some careful mathematical analysis treated, for instance, in [25].…”
Section: Hyperbolic Particle-wave Duality: Complex Geometry and The A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note two things: 1) the I I k-norm defined in ? 3 is a natural extension of the one defined in [2], and 2) this norm, just as in [2], behaves as the usual Sobolev D-norm in the case of compact complex manifolds as far as crucial inequalities are concerned (Theorem 3. 4 and Theorem 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%