2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2911925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complex-time velocity autocorrelation functions for Lennard-Jones fluids with quantum pair-product propagators

Abstract: We use the pair-product approximation to the complex-time quantum mechanical propagator to obtain accurate quantum mechanical results for the symmetrized velocity autocorrelation function of a Lennard-Jones fluid at two points on the thermodynamic phase diagram. A variety of tests are performed to determine the accuracy of the method and understand its breakdown at longer times. We report quantitative results for the initial 0.3 ps of the dynamics, a time at which the correlation function has decayed to approx… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…89 In addition, accurate quantum mechanical calculations have been performed at short times on the symmetrized version of the velocity autocorrelation function 46 using a single-bead PPP treatment. 90,91 The FBSD results are very similar to those of the linearized semiclassical approximation (which is based on the same physical assumption) and were found to be in excellent agreement with the quantum PPP calculations.…”
Section: (E) Fbsd For Neat Liquidssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…89 In addition, accurate quantum mechanical calculations have been performed at short times on the symmetrized version of the velocity autocorrelation function 46 using a single-bead PPP treatment. 90,91 The FBSD results are very similar to those of the linearized semiclassical approximation (which is based on the same physical assumption) and were found to be in excellent agreement with the quantum PPP calculations.…”
Section: (E) Fbsd For Neat Liquidssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This is in agreement with previous simulations of this system at the same temperature and density, and with the same size. 29,30 Figure 4 shows the Kubo-transformed quantum velocity autocorrelation function as obtained via RPMD and the numerical convergence with time of the integral constraints on the right-hand side of eqs 29a−29c. The value of the It is clear that the first constraint integrates to the value of G v⃗ v⃗ (0) in ∼0.2 ps, showing that the correlation function is correctly described over this range of time.…”
Section: ■ Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Wigner model is an old idea, but it is important to realize that it is contained within the SC-IVR approach, as a well-defined approximation to it 39,40 . There are other ways to derive the classical Wigner model (or one may simply postulate it) 6,44,49,50 , and we also note that the 'forward-backward semiclassical dynamics' (FBSD) approximation of Makri et al 24,[28][29][30][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] is very similar to it. The LSC-IVR/classical Wigner model cannot describe true quantum coherence effects in time correlation functions-more accurate SC-IVR approaches, such as the Fourier transform forward-backward IVR (FB-IVR) approach 22,63 , or the still more accurate generalized FB-IVR 64 and exact FB-IVR 5 of Miller et al , are needed for this-but it does describe some aspects of the quantum dynamics very well [24][25][26][34][35][36][37][38]41,42,[65][66][67] .…”
Section: ˆ/ Iht E −mentioning
confidence: 99%