2009
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.200990299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexes of Diquat with Dibenzo‐24‐Crown‐8

Abstract: The complexation between dibenzo-24-crown-8 (1) and diquat (2) was investigated in detail by NMR, MS and X-ray analysis. It was found that dibenzo-24-crown-8 and diquat formed a 1∶1 complex 1•2 in acetone with K a = 2.0×10 2 L•mol -1 , but, as shown by X-ray analysis, a crystalline 2∶1 host∶guest inclusion complex 1 2 •2 was isolated, in which a single molecule of diquat is enclosed in the concave cavity provided by two dibenzo-24-crown-8 host molecules. Both results are different from the previously assumed s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple crown ethers form responsive complexes with small organic guests, and some of them exhibit pseudorotaxane-type geometries. For example, dibenzo-24-crown-8 (DB24C8, 1 ) forms pH-responsive pseudorotaxanes with secondary ammonium salts (e.g., 5 ) and 2:1 inclusion complexes with paraquat ( N , N ′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium, 6a ) and diquat (1,1′-ethylene-2,2′-bipyridinium, 7 ). , The complexation between bis­( m -phenylene)-26-crown-8 (BMP26C8, 2 ) and paraquat is not K + -responsive, but a BMP26C8-based lariat ether displays K + -responsive binding affinities with paraquat derivatives. , Bis­( m -phenylene)-32-crown-10 (BMP32C10) derivatives, such as 3a and 3b , exhibit redox-responsive binding affinities with paraquat derivatives and diquat 7 , but in the solid state, the complexes are found to be mostly sandwich-type structures (“taco complexes”), in which the guest molecules are enveloped within the folded host. , Two exceptions reported to date involve paraquat salts 6b and 6a that form pseudorotaxanes with the urea derivative 3c and the biscarbazyl derivative 3d , respectively. , Bis­( p -phenylene)-34-crown-10 (BPP34C10, 4 ) forms pseudorotaxanes with paraquat derivatives …”
Section: Pseudorotaxanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simple crown ethers form responsive complexes with small organic guests, and some of them exhibit pseudorotaxane-type geometries. For example, dibenzo-24-crown-8 (DB24C8, 1 ) forms pH-responsive pseudorotaxanes with secondary ammonium salts (e.g., 5 ) and 2:1 inclusion complexes with paraquat ( N , N ′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium, 6a ) and diquat (1,1′-ethylene-2,2′-bipyridinium, 7 ). , The complexation between bis­( m -phenylene)-26-crown-8 (BMP26C8, 2 ) and paraquat is not K + -responsive, but a BMP26C8-based lariat ether displays K + -responsive binding affinities with paraquat derivatives. , Bis­( m -phenylene)-32-crown-10 (BMP32C10) derivatives, such as 3a and 3b , exhibit redox-responsive binding affinities with paraquat derivatives and diquat 7 , but in the solid state, the complexes are found to be mostly sandwich-type structures (“taco complexes”), in which the guest molecules are enveloped within the folded host. , Two exceptions reported to date involve paraquat salts 6b and 6a that form pseudorotaxanes with the urea derivative 3c and the biscarbazyl derivative 3d , respectively. , Bis­( p -phenylene)-34-crown-10 (BPP34C10, 4 ) forms pseudorotaxanes with paraquat derivatives …”
Section: Pseudorotaxanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, dibenzo-24crown-8 (DB24C8, 1) forms pH-responsive pseudorotaxanes with secondary ammonium salts 19 (e.g., 5) and 2:1 inclusion complexes with paraquat (N,N′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium, 6a) and diquat (1,1′-ethylene-2,2′-bipyridinium, 7). 20,21 The complexation between bis(m-phenylene)-26-crown-8 (BMP26C8, 2) and paraquat is not K + -responsive, but a BMP26C8-based lariat ether displays K + -responsive binding affinities with paraquat derivatives. 22,23 Bis(m-phenylene)-32crown-10 (BMP32C10) derivatives, 24 such as 3a and 3b, exhibit redox-responsive binding affinities with paraquat derivatives and diquat 7, but in the solid state, the complexes are found to be mostly sandwich-type structures ("taco complexes"), in which the guest molecules are enveloped within the folded host.…”
Section: ■ Pseudorotaxanesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the interior of the molecular squid was expected to share some of the binding characteristics of the parent CPP and calixarene motifs, displaying an affinity for electron-deficient and positively charged π-conjugated guests. The four guests used for further study (Chart ), namely anthra­quinone (AQ), 10-methyl­acridinium (MA + ), diquat (DQ 2+ ), and its phenanthroline-derived benzologue PQ 2+ , were selected on the basis of their established utility in supramolecular chemistry. As we found, crystals of an inclusion complex could be successfully grown from a dichloromethane solution of 1 and 4 equiv of anthra­quinone (AQ) by slow diffusion of methanol vapors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crown ethers [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], cryptands [14][15][16][17][18], cyclodextrins [19][20][21][22], cucurbit[n]urils [23][24][25], and calix[n]arenes [26,27] have been universally used as hosts to fabricate various supramolecular assemblies, which have great potential in molecular devices, chemosensors, and nano materials. Paraquat ( Figure 1) and its derivatives (N,N′-dialkyl-4,4′-bipyridinium salts) are common guests in the field of pseudorotaxanes and rotaxanes [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%