2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.220421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity and Analyst Following of Multinational Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, firm size alone is a controversial measure of complexity, as a firm may increase in size yet not increase the diversity of their product line and markets. Grant et al. (2000) measured business complexity with the metrics of the number of lines of business and the number of geographical regions in which firms operated.…”
Section: Measures Of Business Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, firm size alone is a controversial measure of complexity, as a firm may increase in size yet not increase the diversity of their product line and markets. Grant et al. (2000) measured business complexity with the metrics of the number of lines of business and the number of geographical regions in which firms operated.…”
Section: Measures Of Business Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant, but different, is the literature and work in the measurement of business firm complexity or operational complexity. For example, Grant et al, (2000) define "operational complexity in terms of its lines of business and geographic operations regions, considered separately, jointly, and interactively" and use it to consider how such complexity is associated with equity analyst following. They classify firms according to operating segments, a unit of measure that recognizes the link between a firm's geographic and business line structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the Basel Committee on Bank Supervision highlights three aspects of a firm's balance sheet for determining complexity, each with a 1 / 15 weight (i.e., 6 2 / 3 percent): (1) notional amount of OTC derivatives, 2trading and available-for-sale securities, (3) level 3 assets. Other measures have been proposed, such as the number of subsidiaries (Carmassi and Herring, 2013), the number of operating segments (Grant et al, 2000), or concentration of activities (Cetorelli and Goldberg, 2014) but all are positively related to size.…”
Section: Characterizing Firms' Organizational Structurementioning
confidence: 99%