2014 IEEE 55th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science 2014
DOI: 10.1109/focs.2014.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity Classification of Local Hamiltonian Problems

Abstract: The calculation of ground-state energies of physical systems can be formalised as the k-local Hamiltonian problem, which is a natural quantum analogue of classical constraint satisfaction problems. One way of making the problem more physically meaningful is to restrict the Hamiltonian in question by picking its terms from a fixed set S, and scaling them by arbitrary weights. Examples of such special cases are the Heisenberg and Ising models from condensed-matter physics.In this work we characterise the complex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
98
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the possibility of realizing a universal set of matchgates, the extended spin Hamiltonian that we can implement (see equation (8)) also has an interesting significance from a quantum Hamiltonian complexity perspective [84]. In general, it is known [85] that for Hamiltonians of the form in equation (8) also have the same property [86,87]. Therefore, the realization of the full Hamiltonian with all parameters J K L M ( , , , ) finite would represent the simplest controllable quantum system that is hard to simulate even on quantum computers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the possibility of realizing a universal set of matchgates, the extended spin Hamiltonian that we can implement (see equation (8)) also has an interesting significance from a quantum Hamiltonian complexity perspective [84]. In general, it is known [85] that for Hamiltonians of the form in equation (8) also have the same property [86,87]. Therefore, the realization of the full Hamiltonian with all parameters J K L M ( , , , ) finite would represent the simplest controllable quantum system that is hard to simulate even on quantum computers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires us to initiate any direct reduction with a specific class of Hamiltonians, in so-called Y-free form (see Definition 6.8); informally, these are local Hamiltonians such that each local term is a tensor product of generalized τ X and τ Z observables. In the absence of general gap-preserving reductions between different variants of the local Hamiltonian problem (perturbation techniques [CM14] do not generally preserve the promise gap) we obtain a reduction to the hardness of constant-factor approximations to the ground energy of local Hamiltonian of this form only. Nevertheless, even though the entanglement test requires a qudit dimension that scales (poly-logarithmically) with n, we show that any qubit Hamiltonian in Y-free form can be embedded in a Hamiltonian in Y-free form over qudits of dimension 2 t for any t ≥ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Proof of Corollary 6.14. We start by recalling that the Local Hamiltonian problem is QMA-complete for qubit Hamiltonians in the XZ model, up to inverse-polynomial promise gap [CM14]. Let H = E j∈{1,...,ℓ} H j be a given Hamiltonian on n qubits from the XZ model (also allowing terms that are multiples of the identity), with ℓ = poly(n) local terms H j , normalized such that 0 ≤ H ≤ Id.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kitaev's seminal paper proving quantum-NP-hardness of the local Hamiltonian problem for the case that each interaction couples at most five spins [1] motivated significant progress towards understanding the computational complexity that arises in different variants of the local Hamiltonian problem [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. These results are especially interesting from a computational perspective, answering which families of Hamiltonians are "complicated enough" to perform universal quantum computation [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%