2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity in declarative process models: Metrics and multi-modal assessment of cognitive load

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare IPA, [24] LHIPA, [25] CPD, [9] and BCPD, [9] in addition to the direct PD as reference metric, as single diameter changes can be influenced by the CL level. Except for LHIPA, all metrics should increase together with the level of CL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We compare IPA, [24] LHIPA, [25] CPD, [9] and BCPD, [9] in addition to the direct PD as reference metric, as single diameter changes can be influenced by the CL level. Except for LHIPA, all metrics should increase together with the level of CL.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pupil diameter has been a standard measurement to estimate CL, given its correlation with task difficulty. [9,24,25] Previous works show that complex problems cause an increment in pupil diameter motivating models that employ this fact to determine CL by comparing current measurements with a baseline diameter (basal diameter). The basal diameter describes the natural behavior of the pupil, and it is acquired during a baseline task performed independently (intertrial change in pupil diameter called BCPD), or at the beginning of each step of the main task (intra-trial change in pupil diameter called CPD).…”
Section: Eye-tracker and Pupillometry-based Cognitive Effort Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations