2012
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.112.099259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity in Differential Peptide–Receptor Signaling: Response to Segonzac et al. and Mueller et al. Commentaries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction with RPK2 is not well characterized: single rpk2 and clv1 clv2 rpk2 triple mutant lines display phenotypes highly similar to clv3 mutants, suggesting a functional role for RPK2 in CLV3 perception and repressing WUS expression in the meristem (Kinoshita et al, 2010). Finally, CLV3 was reported to interact with the FLS2 receptor (Lee et al, 2011;H. Lee et al, 2012), which is known to recognize the unrelated bacterial flagellinderived peptide flg22 and activate plant innate immune responses (Gómez-Gómez and Boller, 2000).…”
Section: Sammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interaction with RPK2 is not well characterized: single rpk2 and clv1 clv2 rpk2 triple mutant lines display phenotypes highly similar to clv3 mutants, suggesting a functional role for RPK2 in CLV3 perception and repressing WUS expression in the meristem (Kinoshita et al, 2010). Finally, CLV3 was reported to interact with the FLS2 receptor (Lee et al, 2011;H. Lee et al, 2012), which is known to recognize the unrelated bacterial flagellinderived peptide flg22 and activate plant innate immune responses (Gómez-Gómez and Boller, 2000).…”
Section: Sammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying peptide ligand-receptor (kinase) pairs will furthermore provide insight in the (distinct) roles of the numerous peptides in overlapping expression domains. However, the debate on the CLV3-FLS2 pair (Lee et al, 2011;H. Lee et al, 2012;Mueller et al, 2012aMueller et al, , 2012bSegonzac et al, 2012) illustrates the complexities of peptide signaling and the difficulties of working with these small peptides.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key question is how CLV-WUS pathways integrate with abiotic or biotic stresses. Evidence for CLE crosstalk with defense receptor signaling is controversial, but it remains clear that stress leads to a general reduction in plant growth, and it will be interesting to see mechanistically how this affects CLV-WUS feedback (Lee et al, 2011(Lee et al, , 2012Mueller et al, 2012;Segonzac et al, 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion and Unsolved Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding affinity of the arabinosylated 13-aa CLV3p to its receptor CLV1 (K d = 1 nM) is about 100-fold higher than the 13-aa CLV3p without glycosylation (K d = 280 nM) and 10-fold higher than the 12-aa CLV3p (K d = 24 nM) (Ohyama et al 2009). Notably, the 12-aa CLV3p has been recently reported to provide the immune protection in the SAM through the FLS2 receptor (Lee et al 2011) and the 12-aa and the 13-aa CLV3 peptides showed different activities in immune responses (Lee et al 2012b). Recent studies of molecular modeling for the arabinosylated 13-aa CLV3p displayed that arabinosylation causes the conformational distortion of the peptide, and gradually added arabinose residues from one to three proportionally increased biological activities of peptides (Shinohara and Matsubayashi 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%