2018
DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2018.1510429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity in valuation practice: an inquiry into valuers’ perceptions of task complexity in the Dutch real estate market

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to examine valuer judgement behaviour, by exploring the manifestation of task complexity in Dutch commercial valuation practice. For this purpose, we adopted a grounded theory approach and undertook 18 in-depth interviews with senior valuation professionals across the Netherlands. Our findings indicate a strong presence of situational task complexity in commercial valuation practice, as professionals operating in large valuation teams perceive different elements of task complexity thro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three cases involve practical work situations in different stages of valuation practice (i.e. input/process/output stage) and are based on prior research on valuer's perception of task complexity (Klamer et al, 2018). The respondent is required to select one (out of three) recurring answer modes in each case.…”
Section: Research Methodology Questionnaire Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three cases involve practical work situations in different stages of valuation practice (i.e. input/process/output stage) and are based on prior research on valuer's perception of task complexity (Klamer et al, 2018). The respondent is required to select one (out of three) recurring answer modes in each case.…”
Section: Research Methodology Questionnaire Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of a flexible suite of professional qualifications and educational programs (RICS, 2015;Wilkinson, et al, 2017). The specific knowledge and skills that are essential on the modern real estate market can be identified based on the results of research studies examining property valuers in Australia (Wilkinson, et al, 2018), the Netherlands (Klamer, et al, 2018), Poland and Lithuania (Źróbek, et al, 2016). The preparation of programs for training and improving the knowledge and skills of real estate professionals is a key task if representatives of these professions are to meet current and future expectations (Hannah, 2006;Hughes & Hughes, 2013).…”
Section: Modernization Of Training Programs To Improve the Skills Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements for candidates to obtain full qualifications of real estate appraisers are quite strict and often differ from country to country (Lorenz, 2006;Act, 1997;Adair, et al, 2012;Mooya, 2015;Act, 2012). According to some authors, professional development should not be structured as a one-size-fits-all educational program, as the valuation profession, at least in the Netherlands is a heterogenic population that deals with task complexity issues at different levels and in different settings (Klamer, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Modernization Of Training Programs To Improve the Skills Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much intrinsic knowledge and 'gut feelings' goes into human decision-making, and gut feelings are based on predictable heuristics (Kahneman & Tversky, 1984). Real estate scholars investigate for instance how heuristics cause risk (Wofford, Troilo, & Dorchester, 2010), affect risk perceptions (Dittmann, 2014), which in turn affect housing prices (Freybote & Fruits, 2015), and which settings push decision makers to lean on heuristics (Klamer, Bakker, & Gruis, 2018). While heuristics are often reasonable and can lead to better outcomes when decision makers face uncertainty, they will occasionally lead to solutions that are suboptimal at an individual or social level: As subconscious biases, they will influence decisions independently of applicability in a given situation.…”
Section: Cooperation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%