2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9014-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
615
1
16

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(650 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
18
615
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only could they see interdependencies,28 these leaders were aware of their own role in them. In contrast to several studies of physician leadership which see change as a result of the deliberate communication of leaders’ own visions,3 23 our participants took action based on the full acknowledgement of their organisations’ complexity, that is, visions were created in concert with others 47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only could they see interdependencies,28 these leaders were aware of their own role in them. In contrast to several studies of physician leadership which see change as a result of the deliberate communication of leaders’ own visions,3 23 our participants took action based on the full acknowledgement of their organisations’ complexity, that is, visions were created in concert with others 47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership can also be focused internally, exclusively for the benefit of individual team members, or externally, to deal with wider influences on team performance, or both. Finally, it is possible that leadership may not be restricted to one individual but be shared among team members69 or emerge from complexity 71. It is premature to decide which of these theories or models is most suitable for explaining the diffuse influences of leadership in the OR, but there are several potential candidate theories on which to base future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developments described above and below in the social learning models are particularly encouraging when seen against the background of the rapidly-growing body of literature on the subjects of: • Complex adaptive systems (Pahl-Wostl et al, 2007;Muffatto and Faldani, 2003;Corning, 2002) • Emergence (Dalke et al, 2007;Corning, 2002) • Self-organising (Dietz et al, 2003;Heylighen and Gershenson, 2003;Susi and Ziemke, 2001) • Stigmergic processes, which Heylighen (2007) and Susi and Ziemke (2001) explain as processes in which the work (ergon in Greek) done by one agent provides a stimulus (stigma) that entices other agents to continue the job • Open access development systems (Maidment, 2010;Heylighen, 2007) • Collective intelligence and leadership's role and development in the above (Uhl-Bien et al, 2007) These are all beginning to impact on the discourse informing the emergence of the concept of reasoning support systems …”
Section: Igniting a Field Of Inspired Connectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%