1956
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0350338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of a Chick Growth Response to Egg Yolk, Animal Fat and Fish Solubles Additions to the Diet

Abstract: ference between strains. Yield of bone for the males was significantly greater than for the females at both ages. REFERENCES Duncan, D. B., 1953. Multiple range and multiple F tests.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1962
1962

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus Denton et al (1954) reported that animal fat contained an unidentified growth factor which they postulated as the same factor found in fish solubles. This conclusion was confirmed by Arscott (1956). Menge et al (1957) reported that an unidentified factor, found in the non-saponifiable portion of egg yolk fat, increased chick growth by 18 percent at 4 weeks of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Thus Denton et al (1954) reported that animal fat contained an unidentified growth factor which they postulated as the same factor found in fish solubles. This conclusion was confirmed by Arscott (1956). Menge et al (1957) reported that an unidentified factor, found in the non-saponifiable portion of egg yolk fat, increased chick growth by 18 percent at 4 weeks of age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These results suggest that the growth-promoting effect of the whole egg was due to the gross nutrients it supplied, and the growth-promoting effect of egg yolk on chicks observed by Denton, Lillie & Sizemore (1954), Arscott (1956) and Hopper, Scott & Johnson (1956), attributed in the last two papers to an unidentified growth factor, may also have been due to the fat and protein in the egg.…”
Section: Abstracts Of Communications I957mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Chicks from Red Vantress males were used in the initial experiment(s) cited in Tables 2 and 3 while chicks from White Vantress males were used in the last experiment that comprises each table. Care and management of the battery raised chicks have previously been described by Arscott (1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%