1987
DOI: 10.1137/0608024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of Finding Embeddings in a k-Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
810
0
6

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,008 publications
(817 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
810
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The complexity of this algorithm is, of course, dependent on the variable elimination order and the problem structure. Computing the optimal elimination order is an NP-hard problem (Arnborg, Corneil, & Proskurowski, 1987) and elimination orders yielding low induced tree width do not exist for some problems. These issues have been confronted successfully for a large variety of practical problems in the Bayesian network community, which has benefited from a large variety of good heuristics which have been developed for the variable elimination ordering problem (Bertele & Brioschi, 1972;Kjaerulff, 1990;Reed, 1992;Becker & Geiger, 2001).…”
Section: Example 42 Assumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complexity of this algorithm is, of course, dependent on the variable elimination order and the problem structure. Computing the optimal elimination order is an NP-hard problem (Arnborg, Corneil, & Proskurowski, 1987) and elimination orders yielding low induced tree width do not exist for some problems. These issues have been confronted successfully for a large variety of practical problems in the Bayesian network community, which has benefited from a large variety of good heuristics which have been developed for the variable elimination ordering problem (Bertele & Brioschi, 1972;Kjaerulff, 1990;Reed, 1992;Becker & Geiger, 2001).…”
Section: Example 42 Assumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, P n 1 contain vertices corresponding to opposite literals. But this is impossible, because no P i 1 contains opposite literals, since no clause C i contains opposite literals and because there are no connections between P 1 1 , . .…”
Section: Theorem 1 the Top Problem Is Np-completementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It uses a dynamic programming technique and it is similar to the algorithm given in [1] for the recognition of partial k-trees. Its idea is based on the following lemmas:…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence we can determine the hardness of a given instance with respect to our algorithm in advance. This is not possible for treewidth and related parameters: computation of tree-width or branch-width is NP-hard [3,26], and it is not known whether graphs with fixed cliquewidth ≥ 4 can be recognized in polynomial time [5]. (3) Franco, et al [13] show that satisfiability of certain propositional formulas whose only connective is the implication is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of occurrences of the always-false constant f (this result is listed in the appendix of [10] as pure implicational satisfiability of fixed f-depth); an improved algorithm is presented in [16].…”
Section: Fixed-parameter Tractable Parameterizations Of Satmentioning
confidence: 99%