2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity of the cluster deletion problem on subclasses of chordal graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concludes the proof for inequalities (11) and (12). Next we consider a triplet of nodes {i, j, k} where (i, j) ∈ F + , (j, k ) ∈ F + but (i, k ) ∈ F − .…”
Section: -Approximation For Lambdaccmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This concludes the proof for inequalities (11) and (12). Next we consider a triplet of nodes {i, j, k} where (i, j) ∈ F + , (j, k ) ∈ F + but (i, k ) ∈ F − .…”
Section: -Approximation For Lambdaccmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The latter studied the problem in conjunction with other related edgemodification problems, including cluster completion and cluster editing. Numerous fixed parameter tractability results are known for cluster deletion [8,14,23,24], as well many results regarding special graphs for which the problem can be solved in polynomial time [10,11,17,21]. Dessmark et al proved that recursively finding maximum cliques will return a clustering with a cluster deletion score within a factor 2 of optimal [17], though in general this procedure is NPhard.…”
Section: Cluster Deletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such parameters and graph-types would then guide the derivation of useful fp-(in)tractability results relative to (if necessary, reformulations of) the modularization and remodularization problems defined in Section 2. This derivation process may benefit from both the results listed above and results for closely related problems, e.g., fp-tractability results for Cluster Deletion [4,5] and Highly Connected Deletion [14] and algorithms for Graph Partition [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is known to be NPhard [7] for general graphs. However, it may become easier and polynomial-time solvable in specific graphs, for instance split graphs, block graph, proper interval graph, cographs [8], [9]. Graph classes on which CD is polynomial-time solvable can also be specified by forbidding the occurrence of certain (small) subgraphs in the input graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those results were obtained for unweighted graphs. For weighted graphs, the cluster deletion problem can be solved in polynomial time on the class of K 3 -free graphs for which the CD equivalent to maximum weighted matching [8], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%