Complexity Theory: An Overview with Potential Applications for the Social Sciences

Abstract

Systems theory has been challenged in the recent literature due to its perceived disconnection from today’s research and practice demands. Moving away from the reductionist frameworks and the complicated domain predominated by known unknowns and order, a call is being made to the social sciences to begin adopting complexity theory and newer connectionist methods that better address complexity and open social systems. Scholars and scholar-practitioners will continue to find the need to apply complexity theory as wicked problems become more prevalent in the social sciences. This paper differentiates between general systems theory (GST) and complexity theory, as well as identifies advantages for the social sciences in incorporating complexity theory as a formal theory. Complexity theory is expanded upon and identified as providing a new perspective and a new method of theorizing that can be practiced by disciplines within the social sciences. These additions could better position the social sciences to address the complexity associated with advancing technology, globalization, intricate markets, cultural change, and the myriad of challenges and opportunities to come.

Understanding the Athena SWAN award scheme for gender equality as a complex social intervention in a complex system: analysis of Silver award action plans in a comparative European perspective

“…As regards implementation, by using a complexity approach, agents avoid a reductionist stance and gain new insights into addressing and managing the dynamic process of Athena SWAN, which requires investing into recruiting and developing highly qualified local implementation professionals with the capability and capacity to handle and dynamically respond to new emergent conditions and changes in the environment. Thus, implementation professionals would need to be able to move away from a model that accounts for how the parts contribute to the whole towards a model that tries to understand how each part interacts with all the other parts to emerge as a new entity by looking at the multiple interrelated elements [84]. This would allow a comprehensive understanding of the whole in the localness of each implementing department, i.e.…”

Creating theoretic boundaries for the study of human behavior and emerging technologies: A framework for choosing theory

“…These theories focus on environmental factors that affect the use, production, and modification of technology by humans. However, they also look at the reciprocal relationship between technology and human behavior, looking at how social influences affect technology and how technology influences social processes and behavior (Fox, 1995;Kiwanuka, 2015;Venkatesh et al, 2003;Yousafzai et al, 2010). Finally, another set of theories, such as social identity theory and social learning theory, look at the social affordances that are created through the use of technology.…”

“…The breadth of fields in which diffusion was studied resulted in a more robust theory that many researchers in emerging technology use regardless of the change in tools. More recently, Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, and Davis (2003), created a unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) by analyzing and combining multiple theories in an attempt to find commonalities that could be used when studying human interaction with new technology.…”

“…The goal in both these cases was to develop robust theory that researchers could use to ground research through empirical support and shared research paradigms (Rogers, 2003;Venkatesh et al, 2003). However, Rogers himself noted that as the theory became more structured, the scope of use became more limited.…”

Complex Adaptive Team Systems (CATS): Scaling of a Team Leadership Development Model

“…Chiva et al [30] described adaptability as a "system's capacity to adjust to changes in the environment without endangering its essential organizational features". Adaptability is what differentiates closed systems from open systems; closed systems maintain the status quo while open systems adapt to external forces [34]. This distinction, between closed and open systems, is an important one.…”