2017
DOI: 10.23638/lmcs-13(3:21)2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complexity theory for spaces of integrable functions

Abstract: This paper investigates second-order representations in the sense of Kawamura and Cook for spaces of integrable functions that regularly show up in analysis. It builds upon prior work about the space of continuous functions on the unit interval: Kawamura and Cook introduced a representation inducing the right complexity classes and proved that it is the weakest second-order representation such that evaluation is polynomial-time computable.The first part of this paper provides a similar representation for the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) Space of probability measures [24,44,57] and subspace of Haar measures on compact groups [51]. 6) Spaces of continuous [63, §6.1], of smooth [28], and of integrable functions [29,60]; equipped with operations like (anti or weak) derivative, or trace. 7) Differential geometry, that is, the hyperspace of closed (smooth) manifolds equipped with (smooth) tensor fields on them.…”
Section: More Continuous Data Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) Space of probability measures [24,44,57] and subspace of Haar measures on compact groups [51]. 6) Spaces of continuous [63, §6.1], of smooth [28], and of integrable functions [29,60]; equipped with operations like (anti or weak) derivative, or trace. 7) Differential geometry, that is, the hyperspace of closed (smooth) manifolds equipped with (smooth) tensor fields on them.…”
Section: More Continuous Data Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Item (c) remains true for f ∈ C ∞ 0 [0; 1]: the class of smooth (infinitely often differentiable) f : [0; 1] → R such that f (0) = 0 = f (1); cmp. [8,28].…”
Section: Computational Complexity Of the Haar Integralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…integrating continuous real functions f : G → R. For the arguably most important additive groups G = [0; 1) d mod 1 with Lebesgue measure λ d , this amounts to Euclidean/Riemann integration -whose complexity had been shown to characterize the discrete class #P 1 [13,Theorem 5.32] cmp. [8,28]: indicating that standard quadrature methods, although taking runtime exponential in n to achieve guaranteed absolute output error 2 −n , are likely optimal. And Section 6 extends this numerical characterization of #P 1 to the arguably next-most important compact metric groups:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%