2015
DOI: 10.1080/13678868.2015.1071991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance and ethics programmes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organizations in the United States: implications for international HRD specialists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially when it comes to programs, the two terms are mixed up, e.g. "compliance and ethics program" (Majluf & Navarrete, 2011;Sample, 2015), "(corporate) ethics and compliance program" (Barry, 2002;Weber & Wasieleski, 2013) or "ethical compliance program" (McKendall et al, 2002). Other researchers relate more to "(corporate) ethics programs" in their terminology .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially when it comes to programs, the two terms are mixed up, e.g. "compliance and ethics program" (Majluf & Navarrete, 2011;Sample, 2015), "(corporate) ethics and compliance program" (Barry, 2002;Weber & Wasieleski, 2013) or "ethical compliance program" (McKendall et al, 2002). Other researchers relate more to "(corporate) ethics programs" in their terminology .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhabra & Hossain, 2017; G. S Bhabra & Rooney, 2020;Kecskés, 2016). as well as the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (U.S.) (e.g McKendall et al, 2002;Peterson, 2013;Sample, 2015;Weber & Wasieleski, 2013)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%