Compliance of low-cost, single-frequency GNSS receivers to standards consistent with ISO for control surveying

Tsakiri, Maria; Sioulis, Antonis; Piniotis, George

doi:10.1051/ijmqe/2017006

Cited by 28 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A GNSS survey isconsidered to be qualified for its purpose when it is delivered withsufficient reliability [16]. Therefore, using low‐cost single‐frequency receivers for RTK, there is aneed to ensure that the receiver can meet standards that guarantee areliable geodetic control work [34].…”

Section: Qualitative Performance Analysis Of Cs Resolution Scheme Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

CS detection and correction techniques for RTK positioning using single‐frequency GNSS receivers: trends and comparison

Farooq

Yang

Ada

2019

IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Qualitative Performance Analysis Of Cs Resolution Scheme Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

CS detection and correction techniques for RTK positioning using single‐frequency GNSS receivers: trends and comparison

Farooq

Yang

Ada

2019

IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As the pseudo-range and Doppler measurements are usually used in the GNSS vehicle navigation system, the high-end and expensive systems can achieve real-time positioning accuracy of less than 3 m. However, the cost is too high for ordinary vehicles which only need a primary navigation module [ 2 , 3 ]. With the evolution of GNSSs, there are increasingly systems and enhancement algorithms for positioning technology available, and the positioning accuracy of low-cost, single-frequency GNSS receivers has been improved to a certain extent [ 7 ]. We can obtain a 4–6 cm accuracy level in real-time stand-alone positioning if a CORSs network is used [ 4 , 5 , 8 ].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Police and Insurance Joint Management System Based on High Precision BDS/GPS Positioning

Zuo

Guo

Liu

et al. 2018

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Car ownership in China reached 194 million vehicles at the end of 2016. The traffic congestion index (TCI) exceeds 2.0 during rush hour in some cities. Inefficient processing for minor traffic accidents is considered to be one of the leading causes for road traffic jams. Meanwhile, the process after an accident is quite troublesome. The main reason is that it is almost always impossible to get the complete chain of evidence when the accident happens. Accordingly, a police and insurance joint management system is developed which is based on high precision BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS)/Global Positioning System (GPS) positioning to process traffic accidents. First of all, an intelligent vehicle rearview mirror terminal is developed. The terminal applies a commonly used consumer electronic device with single frequency navigation. Based on the high precision BDS/GPS positioning algorithm, its accuracy can reach sub-meter level in the urban areas. More specifically, a kernel driver is built to realize the high precision positioning algorithm in an Android HAL layer. Thus the third-party application developers can call the general location Application Programming Interface (API) of the original standard Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) to get high precision positioning results. Therefore, the terminal can provide lane level positioning service for car users. Next, a remote traffic accident processing platform is built to provide big data analysis and management. According to the big data analysis of information collected by BDS high precision intelligent sense service, vehicle behaviors can be obtained. The platform can also automatically match and screen the data that uploads after an accident to achieve accurate reproduction of the scene. Thus, it helps traffic police and insurance personnel to complete remote responsibility identification and survey for the accident. Thirdly, a rapid processing flow is established in this article to meet the requirements to quickly handle traffic accidents. The traffic police can remotely identify accident responsibility and the insurance personnel can remotely survey an accident. Moreover, the police and insurance joint management system has been carried out in Wuhan, Central China’s Hubei Province, and Wuxi, Eastern China’s Jiangsu Province. In a word, a system is developed to obtain and analyze multisource data including precise positioning and visual information, and a solution is proposed for efficient processing of traffic accidents.

show abstract

“…Geodetic GNSS instruments are able to measure code and phase pseudo-ranges with high accuracy and precision that indicates better performance [11]. However, they are argued as too expensive in certain applications and, therefore, low-cost GNSS instruments may be seen as a suitable alternative [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Geodetic GNSS instruments were used as a reference to test low-cost instruments in dynamic and static scenarios, and the results indicated that, in certain applications, low-cost instruments can have satisfactory performance that is comparable with geodetic instruments [ 18 , 19 ]. Geodetic as well as single-frequency low-cost GNSS receivers were tested in Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) mode following the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 17123-8.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing the Performance of Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers and Antennas

Hamza

Stopar

Sterle

2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) low-cost multi-frequency receivers are argued as an alternative to geodetic receivers for many applications. Calibrated low-cost antennas recently became available on the market making low-cost instruments more comparable with geodetic ones. The main goal of this research was to evaluate the noise of low-cost GNSS receivers, to compare the positioning quality from different types of low-cost antennas, and to analyze the positioning differences between low-cost and geodetic instruments. The results from a zero baseline test indicated that the u-blox multi-frequency receiver, namely, ZED-F9P, had low noise that was at the sub-millimeter level. To analyze the impact of the antennas in the obtained coordinates, a short baseline test was applied. Both tested uncalibrated antennas (Tallysman TW3882 and Survey) demonstrated satisfactory positioning performance. The Tallysman antenna was more accurate in the horizontal position determination, and the difference from the true value was only 0.1 mm; while, for the Survey antenna, the difference was 1.0 mm. For the ellipsoid height, the differences were 0.3 and 0.6 mm for the Survey and Tallysman antennas, respectively. The comparison of low-cost receivers with calibrated low-cost antennas (Survey Calibrated) and geodetic instruments proved better performance for the latter. The geodetic GNSS instruments were more accurate than the low-cost instruments, and the precision of the estimated coordinates from the geodetic network was also greater. Low-cost GNSS instruments were not at the same level as the geodetic ones; however, considering their cost, they demonstrated excellent performance that is sufficiently appropriate for various geodetic applications.

show abstract

Compliance of low-cost, single-frequency GNSS receivers to standards consistent with ISO for control surveying

Cited by 28 publications

References 13 publications

CS detection and correction techniques for RTK positioning using single‐frequency GNSS receivers: trends and comparison

CS detection and correction techniques for RTK positioning using single‐frequency GNSS receivers: trends and comparison

A Police and Insurance Joint Management System Based on High Precision BDS/GPS Positioning

Testing the Performance of Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers and Antennas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About