2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2011.00613.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance with age and skin type restrictions following the introduction of indoor tanning legislation in Melbourne, Australia

Abstract: The findings suggest that regulation of the indoor tanning industry is a better approach to this health issue than voluntary standards and/or education. Nonetheless, inadequate compliance with requirements to exclude high-risk groups lends weight to calls for stricter monitoring and enforcement, or an absolute ban.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2007 study conducted by the University of Utah on tanning facility compliance to prior (and less restrictive) age-bans found that only 27% of facilities in Salt Lake County were compliant with parental consent regulations [18]. Similar national studies have found low levels of regulation compliance from tanning facilities in states with some form of teen access bans [1921]. Enforcement of current indoor tanning bans represents an important component of policy success, nationwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2007 study conducted by the University of Utah on tanning facility compliance to prior (and less restrictive) age-bans found that only 27% of facilities in Salt Lake County were compliant with parental consent regulations [18]. Similar national studies have found low levels of regulation compliance from tanning facilities in states with some form of teen access bans [1921]. Enforcement of current indoor tanning bans represents an important component of policy success, nationwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that regulation of sunbed use, even in countries with a low prevalence of use, improves compliance with skin cancer awareness and restriction for high‐risk groups and people under 18 years, although strict enforcement must follow to reach optimal levels . In this respect, the sanctions placed after inspections in the PROSAFE report globally ranged from warnings (23%) to fines (30%) or official reports which are rather low considering the observed high rate of non‐compliance with many requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several jurisdictions now prohibit minors from using tanning beds (Box), but compliance with laws has been poor (14) or is in most cases either not tracked or not publically reported. In many countries, no laws regulate use of tanning beds.…”
Section: Applying the Mpower Model To Tanning Bed Reformmentioning
confidence: 99%