Compliance with Gastric-Emptying Scintigraphy Guidelines: An Analysis of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission Database

Abstract

CE credit: For CE credit, you can access the test for this article, as well as additional JNMT CE tests, online at https://www.snmmilearningcenter.org. Complete the test online no later than March 2020. Your online test will be scored immediately. You may make 3 attempts to pass the test and must answer 80% of the questions correctly to receive 1.0 CEH (Continuing Education Hour) credit. SNMMI members will have their CEH credit added to their VOICE transcript automatically; nonmembers will be able to print out a CE certificate upon successfully completing the test. The online test is free to SNMMI members; nonmembers must pay $15.00 by credit card when logging onto the website to take the test.Many variables can influence the results of gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). A lack of methodologic standardization may cause variability, limit comparisons, and decrease the credibility of the test. To address this, in 2009, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) published a procedure guideline describing a standardized, validated GES protocol for adults. Laboratories must closely follow the consensus protocol to provide valid and standardized results and improve patient care. The Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) evaluates compliance with guidelines as part of the accreditation process. The rate of compliance with the GES guideline at a national level has not been assessed. The aim of this study was to quantify compliance with the standardized protocol in a large cohort of laboratories from different institutions and practice settings across the United States. Methods: The IAC Nuclear/PET database was used to extract GES protocols from all laboratories applying for accreditation from 2013 to 2015. Each protocol was assessed for compliance with the methods described in the SNMMI GES procedure guidelines. Fourteen binary variables were assessed: patient preparation (4 variables), meal content (5 variables), acquisition (2 variables), and processing (3 variables). Results: Protocols from 127 labs demonstrated that patient preparation was the category with which the laboratories were least compliant. Instructions for blood glucose monitoring and withholding of medications were problematic. Overall, 69.3% of protocols were not compliant with the content or preparation of the consensus meal: 47.3% used whole eggs instead of egg whites, and additional ingredients not recommended in the guidelines were also frequently used. Only 3.1% of laboratories were fully compliant with all 14 variables. Over half the laboratories were compliant with only 5 variables or less. Conclusion: Almost 8 y after the publication of the SNMMI GES guidelines, there is low protocol adherence among laboratories applying for IAC Nuclear/PET accreditation. This substantial degree of guideline noncompliance is concerning. The variability in GES protocols may have a significant effect on patient management, as results may be inaccurate. Consistent use of the standardized GES protocol permits interpretation of results in...

Endoscopic Botulinum Toxin for Gastroparesis: Results of a Retrospective Series

“…Third, the four-hour gastric emptying scintigraphy performed at our medical center differs with regard to meal content, and consequently reference values, from the consensus recommendation [40]. For future studies, use of the recommended gastric emptying scintigraphy is preferred although recent data described that only 3.1% of laboratories were compliant with the recommended protocol [41]. Fourth, high-resolution antroduodenal manometry did not allow us to reliably assess pyloric pressure and pylorospasm.…”

Vagal dysfunction and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

“…A potential explanation is that subtle changes in motility may promote SIBO, but be insufficiently abnormal to be captured by GES, especially given the ability of unmeasured variables such as poor patient preparation to confound results. 49 Alternatively, the main problem may be dysmotility of the small intestine, which we did not measure. Mechanisms other than dysmotility may also be important, such as exacerbation of GI mucosal immune abnormalities.…”

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Survey of Gastroparesis in Asia by Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association

“…15 Recently, a follow-up study in the United States (US) showed that 69.3% of protocols were not compliant with the content or preparation of the consensus meal. 16 In Asia, literature review showed that there were 3 different types of test meals reported. In Thailand, Vasavid et al 17 used 100 g steamed rice, a microwaved labelled egg, and 100 mL water.…”