2019
DOI: 10.4236/ojepi.2019.94020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliance with Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Test Results and Correlates among Clinicians in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria: 2018

Abstract: Introduction: In sub-Saharan Africa, 80% to 85% of RDT negative febrile patients, seen in outpatient clinics, were given anti-malarial medicines. Previous studies recommended investigating determinants of "compliance with RDT' results" in specific cadre and setting, as intervention is most effective when context specific. Compliance with malaria RDT results and correlates among clinicians in Uyo was determined. Methods: A cross-sectional study of clinicians selected using stratified sampling. Data were collect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the studies were conducted relatively early in ACT implementation in routine care and at the time of mRDT introduction (by design). It may take time for policy change to translate fully into clinical practice, and whilst there is some evidence that test adherence has improved in some settings with strong supervision or training [30,31], other evidence suggests that under-treatment of malaria test-positive patients persists (in proportions both similar to, and higher than, those reported in this paper) [32][33][34]. Based on current data, it would be rash to assume that this under-diagnosis and subsequent under-treatment has simply disappeared since 2013 without further intervention, particularly as the problem of under-treatment in high-risk groups has not been highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Second, the studies were conducted relatively early in ACT implementation in routine care and at the time of mRDT introduction (by design). It may take time for policy change to translate fully into clinical practice, and whilst there is some evidence that test adherence has improved in some settings with strong supervision or training [30,31], other evidence suggests that under-treatment of malaria test-positive patients persists (in proportions both similar to, and higher than, those reported in this paper) [32][33][34]. Based on current data, it would be rash to assume that this under-diagnosis and subsequent under-treatment has simply disappeared since 2013 without further intervention, particularly as the problem of under-treatment in high-risk groups has not been highlighted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In many African countries, adherence of private healthcare providers to their respective national malaria guidelines were found to be suboptimal [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. A study conducted in eastern Uganda has documented a 50.7% (95% CI 21.2, 79.7) adherence to recommended malaria management in private-for-profit health facilities [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many African countries, adherence of private healthcare providers to their respective national malaria guidelines were found to be sub-optimal [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] [13]. Furthermore, in Angola, Rowe et al, (2009) report as low as 30.7% and 49.0% level of adherence of healthcare providers to malaria diagnosis and treatment recommendations, respectfully [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%