2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and high shear strain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
54
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, honeycomb with triangular unit cell is even stiffer compared to hexagonal honeycomb under the same axial stress. Through the comparison of triangular honeycombs, square honeycombs and hexagonal honeycombs under the same force by Ju and Summers [19], triangular honeycombs show the minimal value of normalized shear strain-shear strength, indicating the advantage of triangular honeycombs under shear force. Brenne et al [20] gained insight into the impact of microstructure with square unit cells and local strains on the monotonic and cyclic behaviour under uniaxial and a more complex loading conditions by a plain sandwich structure under four-point-bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an example, honeycomb with triangular unit cell is even stiffer compared to hexagonal honeycomb under the same axial stress. Through the comparison of triangular honeycombs, square honeycombs and hexagonal honeycombs under the same force by Ju and Summers [19], triangular honeycombs show the minimal value of normalized shear strain-shear strength, indicating the advantage of triangular honeycombs under shear force. Brenne et al [20] gained insight into the impact of microstructure with square unit cells and local strains on the monotonic and cyclic behaviour under uniaxial and a more complex loading conditions by a plain sandwich structure under four-point-bending.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeycombs are the typical structures defined by two-dimensional prismatic cellular materials of periodic meso-structures and have been primarily used in lightweight sandwich structures for their high out-of-line stiffness [17,18]. Based on the belief that hexagonal honeycombs are valued for their combination of high strength and low density, Ju et al [19] employed an in-plane linear elastic honeycomb model to compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures, which turn out to achieve both high shear strength and high shear strain. As stated by Gibson and Ashby [17], cells in honeycombs are not always hexagonal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grima et al [12] discussed a new explanation for 2 Advances in Mechanical Engineering achieving the auxetic behavior in cellular solids according to the "rotation of rigid units" mechanism. Ju and Summers [13] analyzed the effects of cell geometries on the elastic limits of auxetic honeycombs under simple shear loading. Based on Eshelby's inclusion concept, Azoti et al [14] explored the design space of auxetic materials through a micromechanical multiscale analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alti-Veltin and Gandhi [4] investigated the energy absorption capability of cellular honeycomb with various cell geometries subjected to in-plane compression through numerical analysis. Ju and Summers [5] carried out numerical studies for design of honeycombs having a high shear strength and a high shear yield strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%