Compliant Mechanisms That Use Static Balancing to Achieve Dramatically Different States of Stiffness

Abstract

Stiffness in compliant mechanisms can be dramatically altered and even eliminated entirely by using static balancing. This requires elastic energy to be inserted before operation, which is most often done with an additional device or preloading assembly. Adding such devices contrasts starkly with primary motivations for using compliant mechanisms, such as part count reduction, increased precision, and miniaturization. However, statically balanced compliant mechanisms with a fully monolithic architecture are scarce. In this article, we introduce two novel statically balanced compliant mechanisms with linear and rotary kinematics that do not require preloading assembly, enabling miniaturization. Static balance is achieved by the principle of opposing constant force and extended to a rotational device by using opposing constant torque mechanisms for the first time. A constant force mechanism based on existing work is used and inspired a novel constant torque mechanism. A single-piece device is obtained by monolithically integrating a bistable switch for preloading, which allows static balance to be turned on and off. The linear device reduces stiffness by 98.5% over 10 mm, has significantly reduced device complexity and has doubled relative range of motion from 3.3% to 6.6% compared to the state of the art. The rotary device reduces stiffness by 90.5% over 0.35 rad.

Compliant mechanisms for dust mitigation in Lunar hardware development: technology and material considerations

“…Furthermore, compliant mechanisms can be constructed as monolithic pieces which can speed up manufacturing and assembly process as compared to rigid-body mechanisms. Compliant mechanisms deform elastically which also means they store elastic (strain) energy [15]. As such after the removal of input force compliant mechanisms spring back to their original shapes -this is behaviour that is desirable in multiple hold down and release mechanisms in the space industry.…”

Using binary-stiffness beams within mechanical neural-network metamaterials to learn

“…A number of mechanisms have had their stiffness adjusted over large ranges by deforming flexible elements until they exhibit negative stiffness that then cancels the positive stiffness of other flexible elements in the mechanism to achieve static balancing [32][33][34][35]. Some compliant mechanisms [36][37][38][39] have leveraged bi-stability [40][41][42] to deform and undeform certain flexible elements so that they exhibit negative and positive stiffness respectively using a bistable switch.…”

Stiffness Compensation Through Matching Buckling Loads in a Compliant Four-Bar Mechanism

“…The buckling condition returns the generalized non-dimensional eigenvalue problem in Eq. (11). A trivial solution would be that θ = 0; however, this means that no buckling is occurring.…”

“…Accumulated strain energy is compensated by the energy stored in the pre-loaded elements during the deformation [9]. As a result, the net change in energy is small; hence, the required input force reduces [10][11][12].…”