2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.maxilo.2015.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complicaciones en reconstrucción craneal con prótesis de polieteretercetona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cranial defects generate functional, aesthetic and psychological alterations that significantly affect the quality of life of patients [5]. The current controversy in reconstruction focuses on identifying the best time to perform it, and on the type of implant (material) to use [1,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Cranial defects generate functional, aesthetic and psychological alterations that significantly affect the quality of life of patients [5]. The current controversy in reconstruction focuses on identifying the best time to perform it, and on the type of implant (material) to use [1,3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, autologous bone grafting is considered the "gold standard" for post-craniotomy reconstruction. However, it is not always possible to use it, since in most cases, these reconstructions are performed in a delayed manner (as in the case presented), compromising the vitality of the graft [5]. Regarding the size of the defect to be reconstructed, the Poukens classification describes small defects (10-50 cm 2 ) which can be reconstructed with autologous bone graft segments or non-personalized titanium meshes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations