2017
DOI: 10.17645/si.v5i2.887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complicating Gender, Sport, and Social Inclusion: The Case for Intersectionality

Abstract: The following opinion piece concerns a reading of the work of Angela Davis and its application to the research on sport and social inclusion. It has the following aims: first, we use her work to argue that racism, as constituted via economics, helps to construct gender; second, we suggest that research on sport and social inclusion would do well to consider the work of Davis in forming a more complex reading of what it means to invite the participation-or inclusion-of women and girls in sport, both racialized … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The way we consider gender in sport has changed and there is a growing appreciation of the intersectionality of race, cultures, and gender. 130 More qualitative and longitudinal studies on how these social norms influence participation over time are needed. Especially during the transition from childhood to adolescence, as it is likely that these peer and family influences change during these different life stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way we consider gender in sport has changed and there is a growing appreciation of the intersectionality of race, cultures, and gender. 130 More qualitative and longitudinal studies on how these social norms influence participation over time are needed. Especially during the transition from childhood to adolescence, as it is likely that these peer and family influences change during these different life stages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps due to such observations, the field of sport research has had a relatively moderate engagement with intersectionality. Despite the measured uptake, there are now multiple examples of active and effective use of the concept (e.g., Abdel-Shehid & Kalman-Lamb, 2017;Engh et al, 2017). Whilst recognising the potential danger of overuse, we argue and explain As men tend to be privileged when decisions are made to fulfil coaching roles (Norman et al, 2018), there have been calls within the sports coaching and S&C literature for deploying frameworks that centralise women's intersectional identities and their coaching career trajectories (Lord & Kavaliauskas, 2022;La Voi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Accordingly, it is best studied, within its socio-historical context, by considering and reconciling the subjective perceptions of its participants [38]. Various studies on social inclusion have adopted the interpretive qualitative approach, such as those of Abdel-Shehid & Kalman-Lamb (2017) [39], and Maxwell et al, (2013) [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The case study approach, adopted in this study, aims at documenting and disseminating good social inclusion practices. The use of case studies as means of analysis has been widely adopted by practitioners in social inclusion and gender equality research [39,40]. It offers a multi-perspective analysis of various sources, facilitating the inclusion of the opinions of relevant groups who might otherwise be underrepresented [40] such as women from rural areas, together with the interaction between these groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%