Complication rates and associated factors in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a comprehensive review

The use of intra-osseous versus extra-osseous distraction devices in atrophic mandibles

“…Anchorage loosening may be explained by a shortage of bone volume of the upper bone segment, either in height or in width, or by improper placement of the device in the upper bone segment. Alveolar distractions of fully or partially edentulous regions are prone to a high rate of complications 2,14 . Only a few studies are available that focus on the fully edentulous mandible.…”

3D vector control during alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis and temporary anchorage devices: a new technique

“…Relapse is considered the second most common complication of distraction surgeries, following insufficient bone formation according to SAULACIC et al 9 , who studied the complication rate in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Less common complications are bleeding, paresthesia, haematoma, infection, wound dehiscence and problems related to the device such as backward rotation, micro bone screw loosening, and fracture of screws 9 .…”

Various Treatment Options for the Single Implant in the Mandibular Anterior Region

“…the present review was 11-28% [46]. During alveolar distraction, the distracted segment may incline lingually because of the lingual muscles [47].…”