2013
DOI: 10.3109/2000656x.2013.819003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications and morbidity following breast reconstruction – a review of 16,063 cases from the 2005–2010 NSQIP datasets

Abstract: Post-operative complications pose a significant set-back for patients undergoing breast reconstruction. This study aims to characterize factors associated with postoperative complications following breast reconstruction using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database from 2005-2010. The 2005-2010 ACS-NSQIP databases were reviewed, identifying encounters for CPT codes including either implant-based reconstruction (immediate, delayed, and tissue expander) or autologous reconstruction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
105
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
8
105
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant independent risk factors have been previously identified, both in plastic surgery and in other specialities (40,44,45,50,72,(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93). However, the advantage of the present study is the evaluation of four different reconstruction methods with the same criteria for complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Significant independent risk factors have been previously identified, both in plastic surgery and in other specialities (40,44,45,50,72,(83)(84)(85)(86)(87)(88)(89)(90)(91)(92)(93). However, the advantage of the present study is the evaluation of four different reconstruction methods with the same criteria for complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Abdominal based free flaps such as the Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous (TRAM) flap and Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap are essential tools in the reconstructive armamentarium post mastectomy. These are often prolonged, complex procedures which can result in more complications than other reconstructive options [6]. Research comparing the two approaches seems to indicate that each method has its strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] Like other NSQIP-based analyses of reduction mammaplasty, there are limitations to this study. [6,27] Follow-up was only 30 days, a relatively short period of time. NSQIP does not include complications such as seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, altered nipple sensation, aesthetic outcomes, or hypertrophic scarring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%