1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1992.tb00758.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications associated with maxillary nerve block anaesthesia via the greater palatine canal

Abstract: This paper documents the type, frequency and duration of complications associated with regional anaesthesia of the maxillary nerve via the greater palatine canal in a series of 101 patients treated in the Oral Surgery Department, United Dental Hospital of Sydney.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Stebbins and Burch (8) reported a 5% incidence in more than 2000 maxillary nerve blocks. Sved et al (25) reported a 36% incidence when using 2.2-8.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for second division nerve blocks via the greater palatine canal. The diplopia began for most subjects immediately after anesthetic solution deposition and generally dissipated before the soft tissue anesthesia wore off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stebbins and Burch (8) reported a 5% incidence in more than 2000 maxillary nerve blocks. Sved et al (25) reported a 36% incidence when using 2.2-8.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for second division nerve blocks via the greater palatine canal. The diplopia began for most subjects immediately after anesthetic solution deposition and generally dissipated before the soft tissue anesthesia wore off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Stebbins and Burch (8) reported 5% incidence in more than 2000 maxillary nerve blocks. Sved et al (30) reported 36% incidence when using 2.2-8.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for maxillary second division nerve blocks via the greater palatine canal. Broering et al (15) reported 10% incidence by using 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Diplopia was reported in 6 patients, 4 of the patients were administered 1.2 ml of anesthesia. This could have been the result of diffusion of the anesthetic into the orbit through inferior orbital fissure blocking VIth cranial nerve pair (Mahoney; Malamed; Tima; Magliocca et al) or excessive carpule depth of the needle from the oral cavity at the base of the skull (Sved et al, 1992). In the case of anesthesia through nostrils, anesthetic spreads through sphenopalatine foramen, which did not however result in greater patient discomfort.…”
Section: Aravena T P; Cresp S N; Büchner S K; Muñoz R C Andmentioning
confidence: 99%