2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications from percutaneous-left ventricular assist devices versus intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock

Abstract: Background There are limited data on the complications with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device (pLVAD) vs. intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). Objective To assess the trends, rates and predictors of complications. Methods Using a 17-year AMI-CS population from the National Inpatient Sample, AMI-CS admissions receiving pLVAD and IABP support were evaluated for vascular, lower limb amputation, hematologic, neurologic and acute kidney injury (AKI)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demographic characteristics including age, sex, race, hospital characteristics, acute organ failure, MCS, cardiac procedures, and non-cardiac organ support therapies were identified for all admissions using previously used methodologies from our group ( Supplementary Table 1 ). 1 , 2 , 3 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Demographic characteristics including age, sex, race, hospital characteristics, acute organ failure, MCS, cardiac procedures, and non-cardiac organ support therapies were identified for all admissions using previously used methodologies from our group ( Supplementary Table 1 ). 1 , 2 , 3 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is particularly salient considering the higher rates of complications and adverse outcomes observed with the use of other MCS devices compared with the IABP in clinical practice. [37][38][39] Although not assessed in this study, the complication rates associated with IABP use in other studies have been low enough to potentially justify a therapeutic trial of IABP placement in selected CS patients. 4,[37][38][39] An important strength of this analysis is the inclusion of a substantial number of patients with CS due to etiologies other than ACS.…”
Section: In-hospital Mortality-multivariable Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[37][38][39] Although not assessed in this study, the complication rates associated with IABP use in other studies have been low enough to potentially justify a therapeutic trial of IABP placement in selected CS patients. 4,[37][38][39] An important strength of this analysis is the inclusion of a substantial number of patients with CS due to etiologies other than ACS.…”
Section: In-hospital Mortality-multivariable Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 63 Cardiogenic shock is also associated with decreased vascular resistance due to various proinflammatory pathways which contributes to the hypotension. 63 - 65 Vasopressors are used to maintain MAP and tissue perfusion pressures with refractory hypotension. Treatment of cardiogenic shock using pharmacologic agents must optimally balance achieving the best tissue perfusion without significantly increasing cardiac work.…”
Section: Vasoactive Medications In Cardiogenic Shockmentioning
confidence: 99%