ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical usefulness of the systemic score in the prediction of life‐threatening evolution in Still's disease. To assess the clinical relevance of each component of the systemic score in predicting life‐threatening evolution and to derive patient subsets accordingly.MethodsA multicenter, observational, prospective study was designed including patients included in the GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano Di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale) AOSD‐study group and AIDA (AutoInflammatory Disease Alliance) Network Still's Disease Registry. Patients were assessed if variables to derive the systemic score were available. The life‐threatening evolution was defined as mortality, whichever the clinical course, and/or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), a secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis associated with a poor prognosis.ResultsTotally 597 patients with Still's disease were assessed (age 36.6±17.3 years; male 44.4%). The systemic score, assessed as continuous variable, significantly predicted the life‐threatening evolution (OR: 1.24, 95%CI:1.07–1.42; p=0.004). A systemic score ≥7 also significantly predicted the likelihood of a patient experiencing life‐threatening evolution (OR: 3.36, 95%CI:1.81–6.25; p<0.001). Assessing the clinical relevance of each component of the systemic score, liver involvement (OR: 1.68, 95%CI:1.48–2.67; p=0.031) and lung disease (OR: 2.12, 95%CI:1.14–4.49; p=0.042) both significantly predicted life‐threatening evolution. The clinical characteristics of patients with liver involvement and lung disease were derived, highlighting their relevance in multiorgan disease manifestations.ConclusionThe clinical utility of the systemic score was shown in identifying Still's disease at higher risk of life‐threatening evolution in a large cohort. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of liver involvement and lung disease was highlighted.image