1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf02553484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of colostomies

Abstract: One hundred twenty-six patients underwent 130 end colostomies, 44 for benign and 86 for malignant disease, and were followed for an average of 35 months. The left or sigmoid colon was used in 99 and the transverse colon in 31. Stomas were made electively in 98 patients and urgently in 32. Seventy-six stomas were brought out through the incision and 54 from separate sites. There were 69 complications in 55 patients (44 percent) including 11 strictures, 9 wound infections, 14 hernias, 9 small-bowel obstructions,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
2
8

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
71
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] A temporary or permanent colostomy for palliative treatment or dual-stage operation deteriorates the patient's quality of life. Furthermore, only 60% of the patients are able undergo colostomy closure later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4] A temporary or permanent colostomy for palliative treatment or dual-stage operation deteriorates the patient's quality of life. Furthermore, only 60% of the patients are able undergo colostomy closure later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Although colostomy can be a type of palliation for patients with unresectable malignant colorectal obstruction and the surgical mortality rate is as high as 17%, only 60% of patients later undergo colostomy closure. [2][3][4] Insertion of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) can rapidly relieve obstructive symptoms, has a bowel-cleansing possibility, and makes multiple sessions of treatment unnecessary. [5][6][7] SEMS can be used as a palliative treatment and, before surgery, for 1-stage operation, without emergency colostomy for colorectal obstruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary direct anastomosis with massive intraoperative irrigation from the oral side of the tumor does not require a temporary colostomy, but such methods have the major disadvantages of a relatively long operating time and excessive invasiveness for emergency surgery in elderly patients (20)(21)(22). There have also been reports of complications such as intraoperative rupture of dilated bowel, wound infection, suture dehiscence, severe peritonitis and DIC (23,24). We always reduce the intraluminal pressure first by creating a loop colostomy within the range of subsequent curative resection in patients with complete bowel obstruction by left colon cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are primary anastomotic procedures involving extensive intraoperative lavage from the oral side of the bowel to avoid the construction of a temporary stoma, but these procedures require a relatively long operating time and also may be excessively invasive for emergency surgery in elderly patients (28,29). Also, there have been reports of serious complications of such procedures, including intraoperative rupture of dilated bowel, DIC, wound infection and dehiscence, anastomotic leakage, and pelvic floor peritonitis (30,31). We have already reported decompression by constructing a loop colostomy at the oral edge of the tumor within the range of subsequent resection by radical surgery, and after the general condition of the patient has improved and sufficient evaluation of concomitant diseases and risk factors has been performed, radical excision of the tumor and combined resection of the colostomy were done by elective standard median laparotomy in patients with complete bowel obstruction due to left colon cancer (12).…”
Section: -------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%