2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00873-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of hydrogel explants used in scleral buckling surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,[16][17][18][19][21][22][23] In this study, there was a low rate of retinal redetachment following removal of buckle (7.7%), and, as mentioned previously, this case was remarkable owing to its complicated primary reattachment surgery, with globe perforation following suture placement. Also, as the buckle was obviously extruding in this particular case to such a degree that it could be safely and painlessly removed at the slit lamp, it is doubtful that this explant was creating an indent sufficient to contribute to a successful surgical outcome, or that its removal actually contributed to retinal redetachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…13,[16][17][18][19][21][22][23] In this study, there was a low rate of retinal redetachment following removal of buckle (7.7%), and, as mentioned previously, this case was remarkable owing to its complicated primary reattachment surgery, with globe perforation following suture placement. Also, as the buckle was obviously extruding in this particular case to such a degree that it could be safely and painlessly removed at the slit lamp, it is doubtful that this explant was creating an indent sufficient to contribute to a successful surgical outcome, or that its removal actually contributed to retinal redetachment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Reported indications for SB removal are numerous and include SB exposure, SB extrusion, migration of SB elements, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] intrusion of SB, 13,[16][17][18][19][20] infection, 2,6-8,10,13 chronic pain, inflammation, foreign body sensation, 3,6,7,9,13,14,21 strabismus and diplopia, [6][7][8][9]10,11,14,21 recurrent subconjunctival hemorrhage, 3 macular distortion, 3 impingement of the optic nerve, 3 swelling of buckle elements, 11,21 granuloma, 10,11 sudden loss of vision, 14 and cutaneous extrusion. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Removal of buckling elements is a significant event, as it can result in scleral perforation, 11,14 endophthalmitis, 14,23 and recurrent RD in 0% to 34% of cases. [1][2][3][6][7][8]10,11,13,14,24,25 Although prior studies have investigated complications of SB removal, [2][3][4][5][8][9][10][11] we are not aware of any recent large case-control study on risk factors for SB removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide range of RR has been reported in the literature 10,[20][21][22][23] after removal of scleral buckles, reaching as high as 34%. Reported rates of intraoperative scleral perforation reach 8% for silicone buckles and range from 0 to 18% for MIRAgel explants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%