1990
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)75581-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Complications of Malpositioned Jones Tubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-term tolerance of the Jones tube is reported to be only about 25%. 26,27 The success rate of this surgery is also questionable. Because of these limitations, there is a tendency to use alternative techniques whenever possible and to perform this surgery only as the choice of last resort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term tolerance of the Jones tube is reported to be only about 25%. 26,27 The success rate of this surgery is also questionable. Because of these limitations, there is a tendency to use alternative techniques whenever possible and to perform this surgery only as the choice of last resort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These permanent prostheses are associated with poor patient acceptance as well as with many complications in 20% to 50% of cases. 1,[9][10][11][12] In our study, the most common complication of the Jones tube insertion was downward displacement (inferior migration), which occurred mostly in the initial groups that had this operation. In other studies, 1,4,6,10,17 extrusion has been reported as the most common complication, occurring in 18% to 51% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, this surgery presents the risk of several complications including tube protrusion, extrusion, malposition and prolapses into the nasal cavity, tube obstruction due to granuloma formation at the conjunctival and nasal opening, and subconjunctival fibrosis, infection, irritation, pain, and frequent production of yellowish nasal mucosal discharge. Furthermore, there are several associated inconveniences, including the fogging of glasses, tearing in the supine position, cosmetic problems due to the visible tubal inlet, and the need for long-term follow-up care [19,20]. For these reasons, other surgical alternative techniques are preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%